2014
DOI: 10.5935/abc.20140177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Myocardial Infarction by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Long-Term Mortality

Abstract: BackgroundCardiac magnetic resonance imaging provides detailed anatomical information on infarction. However, few studies have investigated the association of these data with mortality after acute myocardial infarction.ObjectiveTo study the association between data regarding infarct size and anatomy, as obtained from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging after acute myocardial infarction, and long-term mortality.MethodsA total of 1959 reports of “infarct size” were identified in 7119 cardiac magnetic resonance im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large infarct size increases the risk of symptomatic heart failure and cardiac death. 1 2 3 4 One study demonstrated that patients with an infarction >12% of the left ventricle showed a 7% mortality rate at 2 years, while those with an infarction <12% had 0% mortality. 5 Thus, optimizing the strategy to minimize infarct size is essential to STEMI management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large infarct size increases the risk of symptomatic heart failure and cardiac death. 1 2 3 4 One study demonstrated that patients with an infarction >12% of the left ventricle showed a 7% mortality rate at 2 years, while those with an infarction <12% had 0% mortality. 5 Thus, optimizing the strategy to minimize infarct size is essential to STEMI management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 CMR protocols for studying LV morphology and function in patients with CAD also include the use of contrast media; late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) of the LV myocardium can be indicative of myocardial edema, non-viable tissue, and eventually of scar. 27,28 LV remodeling in patients undergoing CMR was identified by increased extent of LGE, 29 associated or not with low values of LVEF, 30 by significant reduction of the wall thickness, 28 by association between data regarding infarct size and cardiac anatomy, 31 and by assessment of myocardial perfusion changes. 31 We suggest that DP as well could be successfully and easily assessed by CMR, using appropriate images at mid-ventricular and at basal level, with the advantages of excellent spatial resolution, characterization of myocardial tissue and lack of ionizing radiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 LV remodeling in patients undergoing CMR was identified by increased extent of LGE, 29 associated or not with low values of LVEF, 30 by significant reduction of the wall thickness, 28 by association between data regarding infarct size and cardiac anatomy, 31 and by assessment of myocardial perfusion changes. 31 We suggest that DP as well could be successfully and easily assessed by CMR, using appropriate images at mid-ventricular and at basal level, with the advantages of excellent spatial resolution, characterization of myocardial tissue and lack of ionizing radiation. 32 Together with the above-mentioned lack of methodological comparison with alternative imaging techniques, in particular echocardiography, the two most important limitations of this study are the small patient population and the short follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As left ventricular function is related to cardiogenic shock, it could explain our finding that all prognostic significance of CTO or culprit location was lost after adding cardiogenic shock into the multivariate model. The importance of the anterior wall of the left ventricle on prognosis, which is for the most part dependent on the LAD for blood supply, has been well documented both in stable coronary artery disease and in patients with myocardial infarction [18][19][20] left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), caused by a larger final infarct size 19,[21][22][23][24][25][26] . In addition, the observed lower myocardial blush grade (MBG) in proximal LAD culprit lesions could be related to a larger infarct size, more oedema, higher filling pressures, and increased downstream microvascular resistance 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%