2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11886-005-0024-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of myocardial viability by nuclear imaging techniques

Abstract: The assessment of myocardial viability has become important in the diagnostic and prognostic work up of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Patients with viable myocardium may benefit from revascularization in terms of improvement of function, symptoms, and prognosis. In contrast, patients without viable myocardium do not benefit and should be treated conservatively. Various nuclear imaging techniques are available.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the findings from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study and the Veteran Affairs Cooperative Study that suggested that coronary revascularization was associated with improved survival in patients with IHD and LVEF >35% [18, 19]. HF patients with normal or near normal LVEF are more likely to have viable ischemic myocardium, which has been shown to determine both the degree of improvement in LV function and the long-term outcomes after revascularization [2025]. The association between a higher mean LVEF and the presence of viable ischemic myocardium may also explain the higher prevalence of unstable angina pectoris in patients receiving coronary revascularization in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This is consistent with the findings from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study and the Veteran Affairs Cooperative Study that suggested that coronary revascularization was associated with improved survival in patients with IHD and LVEF >35% [18, 19]. HF patients with normal or near normal LVEF are more likely to have viable ischemic myocardium, which has been shown to determine both the degree of improvement in LV function and the long-term outcomes after revascularization [2025]. The association between a higher mean LVEF and the presence of viable ischemic myocardium may also explain the higher prevalence of unstable angina pectoris in patients receiving coronary revascularization in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%