2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10904-013-9856-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Nanoparticle Release from Polyamide 6- and Polypropylene-Silicon Composites and Cytotoxicity in Human Lung A549 Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With a similar study using cutting, drilling demonstrated significant differences and an increase in overall nanoparticle release (Bello et al 2009). In the study by Irfan et al (2013), polyamide-silica nanocomposites displayed up to ten times more nanoparticles generated than from polypropylene materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With a similar study using cutting, drilling demonstrated significant differences and an increase in overall nanoparticle release (Bello et al 2009). In the study by Irfan et al (2013), polyamide-silica nanocomposites displayed up to ten times more nanoparticles generated than from polypropylene materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Drilling is a fundamental and significant machining process used during assembly operations. In a review on the effects of drilling on nanocomposites (Starost and Njuguna 2014;Starost et al 2015), five studies were identified to have investigated the release of nanoparticles from nanocomposite materials (Bello et al 2010;Sachse et al 2012a,b;Irfan et al 2013;Starost et al 2017). All five studies demonstrated nano-sized aerosols to be released due to the drilling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a different study, when nanoclay platelets or silica nanoparticles were dispersed in polyamide 6 and subjected to drilling, the total number concentration of aerosolized particles was significantly greater (usually more than 10x) than when the same particles were dispersed in polypropylene. 5 This same effect was observed when comparing drilling of the two host materials without nanofillers, suggesting the nanofiller characteristics play only a minor role in the release properties compared to the host material.…”
Section: Effect Of the Host Materialmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Studies intended to simulate active sanding processes tend to use motorized industrial or laboratory scale sanding equipment, and a few studies of manual sanding with commercial sandpaper have even been published. [2][3] Release during and after other manufacturing processes such as drilling, [4][5] grinding, 2 cutting/sawing, 2, 6-7 and shredding 8 has also been explored. Most research efforts that study the effects of abrasion on release of ENMs from nanocomposites are concerned with potential inhalation exposures, and therefore they have tended to focus exclusively on aerosol and airborne particle analysis.…”
Section: Release Of Enms Due To Mechanical Degradation Of the Hostmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed, currently only nine studies have evaluated the influence of nanoparticles on nanoparticle release during drilling [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. All of the studies observed nanoparticle release and highlighted the potential hazard and exposure to humans which needs to be understood.…”
Section: Influence Of Fillermentioning
confidence: 99%