1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4488(99)00009-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of natural Ixodid tick infestations in sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourie et al (19) showed that the female was dominant in domestic stock and wild ungulates, except on adult on angora goats where the sex ratio was biased in favour of the males, the sex ratio is an important parameter which characterized the state and dynamics of natural populations of animals and the monthly variations in the sex ratio of the tick on hosts are believed to be related to the large fluctuations in sex ratios of questing ticks. Ogorea et al (20) found that the main attachment sites of fully engorged female of ixodid ticks were ears, head, body sides, perianal and scrotal/udder regions. Over the three sampling periods, 87% of the ticks counted were on the ears in sheep.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourie et al (19) showed that the female was dominant in domestic stock and wild ungulates, except on adult on angora goats where the sex ratio was biased in favour of the males, the sex ratio is an important parameter which characterized the state and dynamics of natural populations of animals and the monthly variations in the sex ratio of the tick on hosts are believed to be related to the large fluctuations in sex ratios of questing ticks. Ogorea et al (20) found that the main attachment sites of fully engorged female of ixodid ticks were ears, head, body sides, perianal and scrotal/udder regions. Over the three sampling periods, 87% of the ticks counted were on the ears in sheep.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar methods using focal host body areas to estimate individual tick burdens have been used previously in other ungulate species (e.g. roe deer, Kiffner et al, 2010 ; cattle, L’Hostis et al, 1994 ; impala, Matthee et al, 1997 ; sheep, Ogore et al, 1999 ; sheep, goats, mountain reedbuck, Fourie and Vanzyl, 1991 ). Digital photographs were taken of the axillary, inguinal, and perianal regions on each host animal before any specimens were removed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratios given are very different from the ratios we found. Ogore et al (1999) compared the tick burden on different sheep breeds in Kenya and found that the burdens varied between breeds. It could be that different breeds in the UK display similar differences, which may help account for the differences we found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%