2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.01.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of nutritional status in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: Whole-body bioimpedance vs body mass index, skinfolds, and leg-to-leg bioimpedance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many patients in this study had nutritional deficit and altered pattern of spirometry, a common situation in adolescents and adults with cystic fibrosis, because the nutritional status, body mass, BMI follow the pulmonary function and indicate a better prognosis (26,27). The use of percentile of BMI in this study is consistent with the literature, because in children over 2 years this indicator is related to adequate growth, besides a lower risk of death (28).…”
Section: Aspectos Clínicos Y Nutricionales De Pacientes Con Fibrosis supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Many patients in this study had nutritional deficit and altered pattern of spirometry, a common situation in adolescents and adults with cystic fibrosis, because the nutritional status, body mass, BMI follow the pulmonary function and indicate a better prognosis (26,27). The use of percentile of BMI in this study is consistent with the literature, because in children over 2 years this indicator is related to adequate growth, besides a lower risk of death (28).…”
Section: Aspectos Clínicos Y Nutricionales De Pacientes Con Fibrosis supporting
confidence: 83%
“…For example, the increase in body fat with age, or changes in composition occurring during weight loss interventions or as a consequence of diseases or drug treatments. [11][12][13][14] This study examines the validity of the leg-to-leg BIA (LTL) device against a multi-compartment model during a period of weight loss and weight regain. Previous studies have shown reasonable agreement in cross-sectional analyses in different populations and situations 10,[13][14][15][16] but it is possible that the change in fatness may be measured with greater accuracy as some of the errors may cancel out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body composition was assessed by bioelectrical impedance (BIA 101 Impedance Analyzer; RJL Systems, Detroit, Mich., USA). Fat-free mass (FFM) was calculated using a specific regression equation [15] and was expressed in kilograms. FM was calculated as total weight minus FFM and expressed in kilograms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%