2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-8636-6_60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Objective Functions Under Mobility in RPL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nodes present different transmission ranges varying in 20m, 30m and 40m. The parameter values follow the work in [22]. The employed routing protocolo is a modification of RPL [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nodes present different transmission ranges varying in 20m, 30m and 40m. The parameter values follow the work in [22]. The employed routing protocolo is a modification of RPL [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After knowing the number of neighbors, nodes broadcast such information to their neighboring nodes (l. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] to run the leader election. For that, the node with the largest number of neighbors is chosen as the leader node, and its category is changed to leader (l. [20][21][22]. Each node keeps a list of neighbors (ListNeig) based on the received control messages (l. [23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: The Thatachi Idsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the experiments have shown an increase in network lifetime, this behavior can be affected by the network structure, and therefore the results might be restricted to specific scenarios. S a n s h i and J a i d h a r [28] consider nodes' mobility using Random Walk, Gauss-Markov, and Random Waypoint mobility models. However, they have not considered full network mobility; they have considered only half of the mobility of the nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%