2017
DOI: 10.2527/jas2016.0930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of objective measures of beef steak juiciness and their relationships to sensory panel juiciness ratings

Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate multiple instrumental measures of beef juiciness and determine their relationships with sensory panel juiciness ratings. Treatments were selected to maximize variation in juiciness and included 5 USDA quality grades (Prime, upper two-thirds Choice, lower one-third Choice, Select, and Standard) as well as 2 enhanced Select treatments (112 and 107% of the initial raw weight) and were prepared to 3 degrees of doneness (DOD; rare [66°C], medium [71°C], and well done [77°… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Percentage moisture lost during compression of sample between filter paper at 78.45 N of pressure for 30 seconds (Lucherk et al, 2017).…”
Section: Quality Gradementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 Percentage moisture lost during compression of sample between filter paper at 78.45 N of pressure for 30 seconds (Lucherk et al, 2017).…”
Section: Quality Gradementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After removal of the 5-cm portion used for SSF, a 1-cm portion of the steak was removed immediately medial to the SSF sample removal (Lucherk et al, 2017). Using a double bladed knife, the 1 cm section was cut into three 1-cm portions, individually weighed on 2 pieces of filter paper (VWR Filter Paper 415, 12.5 cm, VWR International, Radnor, PA), and pressed at 78.45 N for 30 s using an Instron Model 5569 machine (Instron, Canton, MA).…”
Section: Pressed Juice Percentagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Pressed Juice Percentage (PJP) protocol used is described by Lucherk et al (2017). Pressed Juice Percentage samples were weighed on 2 pieces of filter paper (VWR Filter Paper 415, 12.5 cm, VWR International, Radnor, PA) and compressed for 30 s at 78.45 N of pressure using an INSTRON Model 5569 testing machine (Instron, Canton, MA).…”
Section: Slice Shear Force and Pressed Juice Percentagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have attempted to use a variety of methods to objectively measure and quantify juiciness, though with limited success (Sanderson and Vail, 1963;Lee and Patel, 1984;Pearce et al, 2011). Authors of a recent study developed an instrumental juiciness measurement technique that compliments and can be conducted simultaneously with Slice Shear Force (SSF) tenderness evaluation (Lucherk et al, 2017). In that study, the Pressed Juice Percentage (PJP) accounted for 48, 45, and 20% of the variation in trained sensory panel initial juiciness, trained sensory panel sustained juiciness, and consumer juiciness scores, respectively (Lucherk et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%