1982
DOI: 10.1202/0002-8894(1982)043<0338:aooeuo>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of occupational exposure using one-sided tolerance limits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An area is generally considered to be well controlled to a specified level when the exceedance fraction for that level is (5%. 12 Exceedances were not calculated for sample sizes ,15. For all analyses, p(0.05 was considered significant.…”
Section: Airborne Beryllium Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An area is generally considered to be well controlled to a specified level when the exceedance fraction for that level is (5%. 12 Exceedances were not calculated for sample sizes ,15. For all analyses, p(0.05 was considered significant.…”
Section: Airborne Beryllium Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A perhaps more common way to address the problem of compliance to a given TLV is in terms of tolerance limits as described, for instance, by Tuggle (1982), which are the limits of a confidence interval for a percentile of the log-normal distribution. A perhaps more common way to address the problem of compliance to a given TLV is in terms of tolerance limits as described, for instance, by Tuggle (1982), which are the limits of a confidence interval for a percentile of the log-normal distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we have concentrated on obtaining a confidence interval for the probability of exceeding a TLV. A perhaps more common way to address the problem of compliance to a given TLV is in terms of tolerance limits as described, for instance, by Tuggle (1982), which are the limits of a confidence interval for a percentile of the log-normal distribution. In this paper Tuggle refers to published tables based on the non-central T-distribution and the derivation of these confidence limits follows essentially the same lines as in our paper (Section 2.2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, even if all of a number of measures are below the TLV, there may still be a substantial probability that the next measure would exceed it. In order to cope with these difficulties, the results are now usually expressed in terms of probabiility of exceeding the TLV (Tuggle 1982;Hawkins et al 1991;European Norm Project 689 1992) under the assumption that the data are log-normally distributed. This model, the so-called Larsen model (Larsen 1969) is based on many real data sets which are compatible with the log-normal distribution assumption and on some theoretical considerations based on diffusion properties of airborne particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%