2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14040862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Ocean Swell Height Observations from Sentinel-1A/B Wave Mode against Buoy In Situ and Modeling Hindcasts

Abstract: Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) in wave mode is a powerful tool for monitoring sea states in terms of long-period ocean swells of a specific wave directional partition. Since 2016, SARs aboard Sentinel-1A/B operating in wave mode have provided ocean swell spectra dataset as Level-2 Ocean products on a continuous and global basis over open oceans. Furthermore, Level-3 swell products are processed by Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Services (CMEMS) taking the benefit of the unique “fireworks” analysis. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results also compare well with those produced by studies comparing Sentinel-1 data with WW3. Kahn et al [61] reported mean significant wave height errors of 0.15-0.32 m (RMSE 0.64-0.76 m) and Wang et al [62] had mean wave height errors of 0.21-0.32 m (RMSE 0.5-0.64). The sources of error in significant wave height are likely to be the result of incorrectly classified surface points affecting the standard deviation of the elevation calculation.…”
Section: Basic Wave Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results also compare well with those produced by studies comparing Sentinel-1 data with WW3. Kahn et al [61] reported mean significant wave height errors of 0.15-0.32 m (RMSE 0.64-0.76 m) and Wang et al [62] had mean wave height errors of 0.21-0.32 m (RMSE 0.5-0.64). The sources of error in significant wave height are likely to be the result of incorrectly classified surface points affecting the standard deviation of the elevation calculation.…”
Section: Basic Wave Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [15] evaluated the accuracy of Sentinel-1A swell data from April 2016 to February 2017 based on WW3. The results show that the overall observation error of Sentinel-1A is low, and the significant wave height (SWH) observed at WV2 angle is higher than that at WV1 with a systematic deviation of 0.22 m. Wang et al [16] evaluated the accuracy of Sentinel-1 swell segmentation spectra wave height from June 2016 to June 2020 based on the WW3 and NDBC buoy wave spectra data. The results show that the swell wave height error of the Sentinel-1 wave mode is about 0.2 m. However, most of the developed evaluations of the Sentinel-1 wave mode data is based on the wave segmentation spectra and it cannot reflect the actual wave conditions represented by the total wave spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique has been widely investigated in previous studies [2][3][4], and it can provide swell height data at global coverage and climate scales; however, the spatial resolution of the existing satellite altimeter is limited. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) altimetry data have become a new source for swell monitoring [5,6], as well as for swell heigh measurement [7][8][9]. However, this kind of observation is sparse in both time and space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%