2021
DOI: 10.31925/farmacia.2021.1.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Olive Leaves Extract – Cytotoxicity in Vitro and Angiogenesis in Ovo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of nicotine from electronic cigarettes, the irritation score was 9.98, and for nicotine from chewing gum, the irritation score was 2.49 (Table I). Based on the assessment of the irritation score, substances are classified into the following categories: (I) non-irritating substances with an IS ranging from 0 to 0.9, (II) irritating substances with an IS between 1 and 8.9 and (III) highly irritating substances with an IS falling within the range of 9 to 21 [6]. According to these classifications, nicotine from electronic cigarettes is considered a strong irritant, while nicotine from chewing gum is considered an irritant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of nicotine from electronic cigarettes, the irritation score was 9.98, and for nicotine from chewing gum, the irritation score was 2.49 (Table I). Based on the assessment of the irritation score, substances are classified into the following categories: (I) non-irritating substances with an IS ranging from 0 to 0.9, (II) irritating substances with an IS between 1 and 8.9 and (III) highly irritating substances with an IS falling within the range of 9 to 21 [6]. According to these classifications, nicotine from electronic cigarettes is considered a strong irritant, while nicotine from chewing gum is considered an irritant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies employed chemotherapies such as Vincristine [37], cisplatin [38,39,43,49,50,53,61], 5-Fu [48], or Doxorubicin [48,56,59]. In addition, new therapies, such as plant extracts [51,55] or nanoparticles [38,49,58], have been tested. Treatments were administered directly on the tumor surface, that is, topically, in 50% of the cases (Figure 5E).…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Tumor Induction Following the Ex Ovo Method...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine CCD 841 CoN, HCT 116 and HT-29 cellular viability, MTT assay was conducted at 72 h following Met treatment, according to the following protocol [2,3]. In brief, 96-well plates were seeded with 1 × 10 4 /200 µL cells/well and after reaching 90% confluence, Met test solutions were added.…”
Section: Cellular Viability Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%