2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of osteogenesis for 3D-printed polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite composite scaffold with enhanced exposure of hydroxyapatite using rat calvarial defect model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, enhancing the exposure of HA to the surface of the scaffold could potentially improve the ion exchange dynamics between scaffolds and medium and, therefore, improve the osteogenic potential of the nHA scaffolds. To do this, ME-AM scaffolds surface erosion using NaOH, [77, 80, 81] as well as bare polymeric scaffolds coating with HA by ultrasonication, [82] or pre-calcification by immersion in an SBF solution, [83] have been proposed. While these studies commonly suggest the correlation of osteogenic genes upregulation or increased matrix mineralization to the enhanced HA exposure, we believe that careful investigations are still required, as using such surface optimization methods have also shown to dramatically change the surface roughness of the scaffolds, making it hard to decouple the effect of HA bioactivity and surface roughness, as the latter is known to affect osteogenic differentiation significantly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, enhancing the exposure of HA to the surface of the scaffold could potentially improve the ion exchange dynamics between scaffolds and medium and, therefore, improve the osteogenic potential of the nHA scaffolds. To do this, ME-AM scaffolds surface erosion using NaOH, [77, 80, 81] as well as bare polymeric scaffolds coating with HA by ultrasonication, [82] or pre-calcification by immersion in an SBF solution, [83] have been proposed. While these studies commonly suggest the correlation of osteogenic genes upregulation or increased matrix mineralization to the enhanced HA exposure, we believe that careful investigations are still required, as using such surface optimization methods have also shown to dramatically change the surface roughness of the scaffolds, making it hard to decouple the effect of HA bioactivity and surface roughness, as the latter is known to affect osteogenic differentiation significantly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an illustration, 3D-printed HAp ceramics obtained by digital light processing showed the ability to improve the growth and proliferation of MC3 T3-E1 osteoblast precursor cell line as well as facilitate the cell adhesion and migration in vitro (Zeng et al, 2018). Furthermore, in vivo experimental studies have proven that 3Dprinted scaffolds made of HAp and its composites could act as excellent bone replacements, thanks to proper osteoconductivity (Cho et al, 2019b;Sha et al, 2019). It should be mentioned that 3D-printed HAp scaffolds are also found as competent vehicles to deliver osteogenic growth factors like bone morphogenetic protein-2 for improving in vivo bone regeneration (Chen G. et al, 2019).…”
Section: Potential and Significance In Hard Tissue Regeneration And Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A scaffold should be biocompatible and biodegradable, and provide suitable mechanical properties, pore sizes, and well-interconnected pores [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Many studies using 3D-printing techniques, including stereolithography apparatus (SLA) [ 10 ], selective laser sintering (SLS) [ 11 ], and melting extrusion (3D plotting) [ 12 ], have been proposed for fabricating a scaffold satisfying the abovementioned requirements. The 3D-printing technique is known to enable customized 3D scaffolds with suitable pore size, porosity, and interconnected pore networks using biocompatible and biodegradable materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%