2023
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1139264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of past and future land use/cover change over Tordzie watershed in Ghana

Abstract: Land use/ land cover (LULC) change has been identified as the main driving force of global change. The study investigated LULC change in Tordzie watershed in Ghana and predicted the future development. The supervised classification procedure was applied to Landsat images of 1987, 2003, and 2017. The cellular automata–Markov model embedded in IDRISI 17 software was employed to model LULC for the years 2030 and 2050. The trend of LULC change was exploited from 1987 to 2003, from 2003 to 2017, and projected to 20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The validation module assesses the level of agreement and disagreement between the CA-Markov predicted LCLU map and the classified LCLU map. An overall agreement (Kno) exceeding 0.8 indicates a strong agreement between the CA-Markov predicted and the classified LCLU maps (Nyatuame et al, 2023;Mishra et al, 2018;Mondal et al, 2016). In this study, if the overall accuracy assessment of the LCLU classification was above 85%, and the CA-Markov predicted LCLU did not achieve an overall accuracy of 0.8, the LCLU maps were not reworked.…”
Section: Calibration and Validation Of The Ca-markov Modelmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The validation module assesses the level of agreement and disagreement between the CA-Markov predicted LCLU map and the classified LCLU map. An overall agreement (Kno) exceeding 0.8 indicates a strong agreement between the CA-Markov predicted and the classified LCLU maps (Nyatuame et al, 2023;Mishra et al, 2018;Mondal et al, 2016). In this study, if the overall accuracy assessment of the LCLU classification was above 85%, and the CA-Markov predicted LCLU did not achieve an overall accuracy of 0.8, the LCLU maps were not reworked.…”
Section: Calibration and Validation Of The Ca-markov Modelmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Finally, the CA-Markov model was executed with the 2013 LCLU map as the image from which 2023 LCLU was to be predicted, Markov transition areas file and the suitability image outputted from CA module as inputs. The reader can refer to Nyatuame et al, (2023), Mondal et al (2016), Memarian et al (2012) for on the calibration process for the CA-Markov.…”
Section: Calibration and Validation Of The Ca-markov Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relationship between the LULC type, LULC change, impacts, and controls of land cover change must be presented understandably without oversimplification of the issues or their interactions. This study has adopted and merged two frameworks, namely, the conceptual framework of LULC dynamics (Nyatuame et al, 2023;Suale et al, 2023). The frameworks (Fig.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%