2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07653-9_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Peripheral Diabetic Neuropathy: New versus Conventional Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 2000 Hz stimulus selectively induces large myelinated fiber responses and the 5 Hz stimulus selectively triggers unmyelinated fiber responses [ 14 ]. The device quantifies in a quickly and painless manner the conduction and functional integrity of the large and small myelinated and small unmyelinated sensory nerve fibers [ 15 ]. The device produces transcutaneous electrical stimuli through a pair of gold plated electrodes to quantify neuroselective CPT values.…”
Section: Current Perception Threshold Using the Neurometer® - Descripmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 2000 Hz stimulus selectively induces large myelinated fiber responses and the 5 Hz stimulus selectively triggers unmyelinated fiber responses [ 14 ]. The device quantifies in a quickly and painless manner the conduction and functional integrity of the large and small myelinated and small unmyelinated sensory nerve fibers [ 15 ]. The device produces transcutaneous electrical stimuli through a pair of gold plated electrodes to quantify neuroselective CPT values.…”
Section: Current Perception Threshold Using the Neurometer® - Descripmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also conducted a study on 60 patients with type 2 diabetes, who were divided in three groups based on their diabetes durations (<5 years, 5–10 years, >10 years), and the patients were assessed for the presence of DPN using two different methods: Semmes - Weinstein Monofilament testing (SWMT) and rapid-current perception threshold measurement using the Neurometer® [ 15 ].…”
Section: Using the Neurometer® For The Screening And Diagnosis Of Diamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although obesity is closely associated with IGT, our study is not comparable with the findings of the abovementioned research, due to the fact that we did not take the effect of glucose intolerance into account, nor did we make a comparison with a healthy control group (36). Based on the results of a study using both the neurometer and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing (SWMT) for the evaluation of DPN, Inceu et al reported that PN is more frequent in diabetic individuals with >10 years of disease duration than in patients who have been suffering from diabetes for <5 years (27). Since the duration of diabetes was not considered in our study, our result of the comparison analysis cannot be actually compared to that of Inceu et al The involvement of controlled, well-treated participants without clinical signs of PN may also explain why no significant differences were found concerning the CPT values between groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of current perception threshold (CPT) applying a neurometer (NM-01/CPT; MSB-MET Ltd., Hungary) was also performed to detect peripheral nerve dysfunction. The neurometer was used to quantify both the conduction and the functional integrity of the large and small myelinated as well as small unmyelinated sensory nerve fibers (27).…”
Section: Nerve Conducting Studies Applying Neurometermentioning
confidence: 99%