2007
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of phylogenomic and orthology approaches for phylogenetic inference

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the BBB model implies two crucial aspects of these trees that are both compatible with empirical data: i) the deep internal branches of gene trees are strongly compressed as dictated by the rapidity of evolution during inflationary phases, and ii) in general, there is no reason for the topologies of the trees for individual genes to be the same in their deep parts, given the rampant reassortment and recombination of genetic elements during the inflationary phases (although, toward the end of an inflationary stage, some gene combinations would become relatively stable, rendering a degree of coherence on some of the gene trees). An implication of these notions is that concatenation of protein sequences in an attempt to enhance the signal and resolve deep phylogenies, a common approach in genome-wide phylogenetic analysis [22,99,100], is a highly suspect practice at best.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the BBB model implies two crucial aspects of these trees that are both compatible with empirical data: i) the deep internal branches of gene trees are strongly compressed as dictated by the rapidity of evolution during inflationary phases, and ii) in general, there is no reason for the topologies of the trees for individual genes to be the same in their deep parts, given the rampant reassortment and recombination of genetic elements during the inflationary phases (although, toward the end of an inflationary stage, some gene combinations would become relatively stable, rendering a degree of coherence on some of the gene trees). An implication of these notions is that concatenation of protein sequences in an attempt to enhance the signal and resolve deep phylogenies, a common approach in genome-wide phylogenetic analysis [22,99,100], is a highly suspect practice at best.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no single, optimal method to define the age of a gene. Considering that new genes typically emerge as a result of gene duplication, one of the more sophisticated approaches includes evolutionary reconstructions that map each duplication to a specific branch in the corresponding species tree and consider that branch the ''birth date'' of the gene in question (36,37). However, this approach is both labor-consuming and error-prone, so we used a more straightforward (and cruder) procedure for partitioning genes into age classes.…”
Section: Age Classes Of Eukaryotic Genes and Their Distinct Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, one classical problem of metagenomics and metatranscriptomics-based gene targeting is the difficulty of assigning observed functions to specific taxa (Dutilh et al 2007). However, recent increases in obtainable sequence read length and assembled fragments have resulted in major improvements.…”
Section: Pitfalls To Current Multi-omics Methods and Ways Around The mentioning
confidence: 99%