Assessment of physical activity in middle-aged and older adults with schizophrenia

Lindamer, Laurie A.; McKibbin, Christine L.; Norman, Gregory J.; Jordan, Leslie; Harrison, Kelly A.; Abeyesinhe, Suranee; Patrick, Kevin

doi:10.1016/j.schres.2008.04.040

Cited by 128 publications

(123 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

112

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 3 provides full details of the OBM used. & Kirchner, 2006;Faulkner, Cohn, & Reminghton, 2006;Lindamer et al, 2008;Ma, Chiang, Yen, Huang, & Tsai, 2011;. 1 study validated the RT3 accelerometer Sharpe et al, 2006a.…”

Section: The Identification Of the Different Outcome Measures Usedmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…16 studies used as part or in full an OBM to capture physical activity Berle, Hauge, Oedegaard, Holsten, & Fasmer, 2010;Farrow, Hunter, Wilikinson, Green, & Spence, 2005;Gothelf et al, 2002;Hauge, Berle, Oedegaard, Holsten, & Fasmer, 2011;Janney et al, 2008;Jerome et al, 2009;McCormick et al, 2009;McCormick et al, 2008;McKibbin et al, 2006;Scheewe, 2008;Scheewe et al, 2011;Sharpe et al, 2006a;Wichniak et al, 2011;Yamamoto et al, 2011. 19 studies utilised SRQs Archie et al, 2007Arbour, Faulkner, & Cohn, 2010;Brown, Birtwistle, Roe, & Thompson, 1999, Brown, Goetz, Van Sciver, Sullivan, & Hamera, 2006Dubbert et al, 2006;Ellingrod et al, 2011;Elmslie, Mann, Silverstone, Williams, & Romans, 2001;Faulkner et al, 2006;Lassenigus, kerlind, Wiklund-Gustin, Arman, & Söderlund, 2013;Lindamer et al, 2008;McLeod, Jaques, & Deane, 2009;Osborn, Nazareth, & King, 2007;Ratliff et al, 2012;Ussher, 2003;Ussher, Doshi, Sampuran, & West, 2011;Van Citters et al, 2010;Vancampfort, Probst, Knapen, Carraro, & De Hert, 2012. Excluded studies (with reason) 55 did not use an outcome measure that provided an assessment of the three fundamental domains of physical activity Acil, Dogan, & Dogan, 2008;Adams, 1995;Aquila, 2000;Archie,...…”

Section: The Identification Of the Different Outcome Measures Usedmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, there was a high reliance of studies towards an original validating study, without further justification for the use of the outcome measure. Three studies using SRQs (Dubbert et al, 2006;Lindamer et al, 2008;) scored 5/6 or 6/6. Three main criteria were most often missed by studies that used SRQs, these were (a) the lack of consideration of the appropriateness of the measure selected; (b) the calculation for the output given; (c) additional validation studies were not considered or identified.…”

Section: The Justification and Choice For The Different Outcome Measumentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A detailed consideration was undertaken of the five articles that validated SRQs (Dubbert et al, 2006;Faulkner et al, 2006;Lindamer et al, 2008;Ma et al, 2011; and one article that validated the RT3 accelerometer against doubly labeled water (Sharpe et al, 2006a). Two unpublished PhD thesis were accessed as part of this to allow further consideration of the research undertaken (Sharpe, 2007;.…”

Section: The Psychometric Properties Of Outcome Measures That Have Bementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Selection, Use and Psychometric Properties of Physical Activity Measures to Assess Individuals with Severe Mental Illness: A Narrative Synthesis

Soundy¹,

Roskell²,

Stubbs³

et al. 2014

Archives of Psychiatric Nursing

131

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c tThis research provides a critical consideration of the outcome measures used to assess physical activity in individuals with severe mental illness. A narrative synthesis was utilised to provide a simple juxtapose of the current research. A sensitive topic-based search strategy was conducted in order to identify studies that met the eligibility criteria. Fifty two studies met the inclusion criteria and 5 were identified specially as validation studies. The current research identified several methodological shortcomings. The justification and choice of outcome measure used is often weak and only five studies have validated a specific outcome measure of physical activity. Within these validation studies, the validation process often lacked a consideration of agreement between measures. Accelerometers have been most frequently used as a criterion measure, notably the RT3 tri-axial accelerometer. Objective based measures may be best placed to consider physical activity levels, although, methodological considerations for the utilization of such tools is required. Self-report questionnaires have benefits for use in this population but require further validation. Researchers and clinicians need to carefully consider what outcome measure they are using and be aware of the development, scope and purpose of that measure.Crown

show abstract

Section: The Identification Of the Different Outcome Measures Usedmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: The Identification Of the Different Outcome Measures Usedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Justification and Choice For The Different Outcome Measumentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Psychometric Properties Of Outcome Measures That Have Bementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Selection, Use and Psychometric Properties of Physical Activity Measures to Assess Individuals with Severe Mental Illness: A Narrative Synthesis

Soundy¹,

Roskell²,

Stubbs³

et al. 2014

Archives of Psychiatric Nursing

131

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ninety eight full texts were reviewed and 85 were excluded with reasons (see figure 1), with 13 unique studies meeting the eligibility criteria (Baker et al, 2014;Gomes et al, 2014;Hahn et al, 2014;Janney et al, 2014;Janney et al, 2013;Leutwyler et al, 2014;Lindamer et al, 2008;Snethen et al, 2014;Strassnig et al, 2012;Stubbs et al, 2015a;TW, 2008;Vancampfort et al, 2014;Vancampfort et al, 2012b). Full details of the search results are summarized in figure 1.…”

Section: Study Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How sedentary are people with psychosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Stubbs

Williams

Gaughran

et al. 2016

Schizophrenia Research

243

165

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveSedentary behaviour (SB) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate SB levels and predictors in people with psychosis. MethodMajor electronic databases were searched from inception till 09/2015 for articles measuring SB with a self-report questionnaire (SRQ) or objective measure (e.g. accelerometer) in people with psychosis, including schizophrenia spectrum and bipolar disorders. A random effects meta-analysis and meta regression analysis were conducted. ResultsThirteen studies were eligible including 2,033 people with psychosis (mean age 41.3 years (range 25.1-60), 63.2% male (range 35-89%), body mass index 28.7 (range 25.9-32.1). The trim and fill analysis demonstrated people with psychosis spent 660.8 minutes (95% CI 523.2-798.4, participants=2,033) or 11.0 hours (95% CI 8.72-13.3) per day being sedentary. Objective measures of SB recorded significantly higher levels (p <0.001) of SB (12.6 hours per day, 95% CI 8.97-16.2, studies=7, participants=254) compared to self-report SB (6.85 hours per day, 95% CI 4. 75-8.96, studies=6, participants=1,779). People with psychosis engaged in significantly more SB than controls (g=1.13, 95% CI 0.496-1.77, P<0.001, n psychosis = 216, n controls=159) equating to a mean difference of 2.80 (95% CI 1.47-4.1) hours per day. Multivariate meta-regression confirmed that objective measurement of SB predicted higher levels of sedentariness. ConclusionsPeople with psychosis engage in very high levels of sedentary behavior in their waking day and current SRQ may underestimate SB. Given that SB is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease, future interventions specifically targeting the prevention of SB are warranted. Systematic review registration -PROSPERO registration number CRD420150261593

show abstract

Exercise therapy for schizophrenia

Gorczynski

Faulkner

2010

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

150

137

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The health benefits of physical activity and exercise are well documented and these effects could help people with schizophrenia. Objectives To determine the mental health effects of exercise/physical activity programmes for people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like illnesses. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (December 2008) which is based on regular searches of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO. We also inspected references within relevant papers. Selection criteria We included all randomised controlled trials comparing any intervention where physical activity or exercise was considered to be the main or active ingredient with standard care or other treatments for people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like illnesses. Data collection and analysis We independently inspected citations and abstracts, ordered papers, quality assessed and data extracted. For binary outcomes we calculated a fixed-effect risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Where possible, the weighted number needed to treat/ harm statistic (NNT/H) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), was also calculated. For continuous outcomes, endpoint data were preferred to change data. We synthesised non-skewed data from valid scales using a weighted mean difference (WMD). Main results Three randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Trials assessed the effects of exercise on physical and mental health. Overall numbers leaving the trials were similar. Two trials compared exercise to standard care and both found exercise to significantly improve negative symptoms of mental state (Mental Health Inventory Depression:1RCT, n=10, MD 17.50 CI 6.70 to 28.30, PANSS negative: 1RCT, n=10, MD -8.50 CI -11.11 to -5.89). No absolute effects were found for positive symptoms of mental state. Physical health improved significantly in the exercise group compared to those in standard care (1RCT, n=13, MD 79.50 CI 33.82 to 125.18), but no effect on peoples’ weight/BMI was apparent. One trial compared exercise with yoga and found that yoga had a better outcome for mental state (PANSS total: 1RCT, n=41, MD 14.95 CI 2.60 to 27.30). The same trial also found those in the yoga group had significantly better quality of life scores (WHOQOL Physical: 1RCT, n=41, MD -9.22 CI -18.86 to 0.42). Adverse effects (AIMS total scores) were, however, similar. Authors’ conclusions Results of this Cochrane review are similar to existing reviews that have examined the health benefits of exercise in this population. Although studies included in this review are small and used various measures of physical and mental health, results indicated that regular exercise programmes are possible in this population, and that they can have healthful effects on both the physical and mental health and well-being of individuals with schizophrenia. Larger randomised studies are required before any definitive conclusions can be drawn.

show abstract

Assessment of physical activity in middle-aged and older adults with schizophrenia

Cited by 128 publications

References 28 publications

Selection, Use and Psychometric Properties of Physical Activity Measures to Assess Individuals with Severe Mental Illness: A Narrative Synthesis

Selection, Use and Psychometric Properties of Physical Activity Measures to Assess Individuals with Severe Mental Illness: A Narrative Synthesis

How sedentary are people with psychosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Exercise therapy for schizophrenia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About