2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.13196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Placebo Response in Objective and Subjective Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials

Abstract: Key Points Question Are subjective patient-reported outcomes vs objective biomarkers associated with higher placebo responses in clinical trials? Findings In this cross-sectional study examining the placebo arms of 5 randomized clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis including 788 patients, objective markers of inflammation and subjective pain ratings improved in a comparable clinically meaningful magnitude. Baseline values were associated with placebo resp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the CAT score of our participants met the minimum of clinical important differences (33) of a 2-unit reduction in both groups, its mean differences was not signi cant between groups (mean difference [95% CI]: 0.57 [-2.5, 3.7]). The CAT score reduction in the placebo group can be explained by placebo effect (34). In contrary to our ndings, Maneechotesuwan et al, studied the effect of simvastatin 20 mg daily versus placebo on sputum in ammatory markers, airway in ammation, and CAT score of 30 patients with stable COPD (35), and found clinically signi cant important reduction in CAT score after statin administration.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Although the CAT score of our participants met the minimum of clinical important differences (33) of a 2-unit reduction in both groups, its mean differences was not signi cant between groups (mean difference [95% CI]: 0.57 [-2.5, 3.7]). The CAT score reduction in the placebo group can be explained by placebo effect (34). In contrary to our ndings, Maneechotesuwan et al, studied the effect of simvastatin 20 mg daily versus placebo on sputum in ammatory markers, airway in ammation, and CAT score of 30 patients with stable COPD (35), and found clinically signi cant important reduction in CAT score after statin administration.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The small sample size makes it difficult to draw conclusions about the performance of either arm, though both subjective and objective measures have been seen to improve in the placebo arms of trials in other conditions. 36 We performed multiple baseline fatigue measurements prior to commencing medications given the subjective nature of fatigue, in line with previous suggestions, 36 though other aspects of the trial design may have influenced the outcomes in the placebo arm. The high level of contact with the study team may have reduced anxiety levels 37 38 ; anxiety is known to moderate fatigue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the CAT score of our participants met the minimum of clinical important differences [ 33 ] of a 2-unit reduction in both groups, its mean differences was not significant between groups (mean difference [95% CI]: 0.57 [− 2.5, 3.7]). The CAT score reduction in the placebo group can be explained by placebo effect [ 34 ]. In contrary to our findings, Maneechotesuwan et al [ 35 ] studied the effect of simvastatin 20 mg daily versus placebo on sputum inflammatory markers, airway inflammation, and CAT score of 30 patients with stable COPD, and found clinically significant important reduction in CAT score after statin administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%