2021
DOI: 10.9734/jammr/2021/v33i130788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Platelet/ Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of Erythropoietin Resistance in Hemodialysis Patients

Abstract: Background: Platelet / lymphocyte ratio has recently been investigated in different clinical conditions associated with hemodialysis and its association with other diseases has been assessed. The purpose of the study was to assess platelet lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of erythropoietin resistance in hemodialysis patients. Methods: The study population consisted of 60 hemodialysis patients, who were subdivided into two groups according to the response to erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs) .treatm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sheikh et al (18) found that PLR had a sensitivity of 93%, a specificity of 80%, a positive predictive value of 82%, and a negative predictive value of 92%, yielding an overall accuracy of 87%, our cutoff value for PLR was 125.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sheikh et al (18) found that PLR had a sensitivity of 93%, a specificity of 80%, a positive predictive value of 82%, and a negative predictive value of 92%, yielding an overall accuracy of 87%, our cutoff value for PLR was 125.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Additionally, Taymez et al (17) found that PLR levels increased from the 25th to the 75th percentile on the EHRI (P= 0.032) when comparing the 25th and 50th percentiles. Moreover, Sheikh et al (18) found that EPO resistant group had much higher mean values of platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), with statistically significant difference as (P=0.001). This is mostly contributed to the difference in the study population characteristics regarding the ethnicity of patients, durations of their illness and different sample size, along with different ESA generics used in these studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%