2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of possible solid-phase phosphate sorbents to mitigate eutrophication: Influence of pH and anoxia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
32
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is the possibility of being affected by the redox potential, especially in the bottom of the eutrophic system which is anoxic. 63 It can thus reduce the iron(III) to iron(II) with the release of adsorbed phosphate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there is the possibility of being affected by the redox potential, especially in the bottom of the eutrophic system which is anoxic. 63 It can thus reduce the iron(III) to iron(II) with the release of adsorbed phosphate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A disadvantage for our material is the possibility of the environment redox potential to affect the adsorption capacity of phosphate. 63 Generally, in a eutrophic environment, the dissolved oxygen value is low and iron(III) may be reduced to iron(II) with the release of the phosphate adsorbed into the water.…”
Section: -mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lanthanum is not redox sensitive and has strong affinity for phosphate with which it precipitates as the LaPO 4 mineral -rhabdophane (K sp = 10 -24.7 to 10 -25.7 mol 2 l −2 ) (Johannesson and Lyons, 1994;Liu and Byrne, 1997). Rhabdophane is stable at least in the pH range 5-9 (Copetti et al, 2016); LMB showed excellent phosphate removal when tested in the pH range 6-9 (Mucci et al, 2018).…”
Section: Geo-engineering Using Lmbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are reports of this phenomenon in the literature from doses ≥8 mg Al −1 [21,23], almost three times more than the 3 mg Al L −1 dose chosen as the optimal dose in this study. The Φ PSII was not affected up to 1 mg of AL L −1 and decrease sharply from this concentration, being at odds with other studies where the decrease was recorded from 8 mg Al L −1 [41,50,51]. Miranda et al [21] observed a reduction not only in the Φ PSII but also in the pH in water dominated by Microcystis when using higher doses of PAC (16 and 32 mg Al L −1 ) in the PAC range test.…”
Section: Coagulant Rangementioning
confidence: 82%