2005
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2005.682.299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Postharvest Handling Systems of Vegetables in the Eastern Hills of Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of these findings support earlier published studies reporting high levels of postharvest losses in developing countries that occur because of poor temperature management, handling damage, decay incidence and market value reduction in various crops (Roy, 1993;Ndunguru et al, 2000;Lana et al, 2002;Pandey et al, 2003;El-Assi, 2004;Prigojin et al, 2005;Udas et al, 2005;Bani et al, 2006;Kumar et al, 2006;Weinberger et al, 2008;Vayssieres et al, 2008). While the findings of this study are predictable given the known typical conditions of postharvest handling, documenting the losses in the four target countries for small farmers during 2009 was considered a key step for designing appropriate future loss prevention efforts.…”
Section: Time To Reach Retail Marketssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Many of these findings support earlier published studies reporting high levels of postharvest losses in developing countries that occur because of poor temperature management, handling damage, decay incidence and market value reduction in various crops (Roy, 1993;Ndunguru et al, 2000;Lana et al, 2002;Pandey et al, 2003;El-Assi, 2004;Prigojin et al, 2005;Udas et al, 2005;Bani et al, 2006;Kumar et al, 2006;Weinberger et al, 2008;Vayssieres et al, 2008). While the findings of this study are predictable given the known typical conditions of postharvest handling, documenting the losses in the four target countries for small farmers during 2009 was considered a key step for designing appropriate future loss prevention efforts.…”
Section: Time To Reach Retail Marketssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Postharvest loss on cabbage at farm level was found 4.76±1.55 percent, however, another study found 9 percent on cabbage (Kader & Davis, 2009;Udas, Rai, Khatiwada, Gurung, & Thapa, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Means of transportation like vehicle, road infrastructure, etc. play a major role in the post-harvest losses (Ayandiji et al, 2009;Chohan and Ahmad, 2008;Aujla et al, 2007;Udas et al, 2005;Bari, 2004;Basappa et al, 2001;Bachmann and Earles, 2000;Kader, 1992;Liu, 1990). On transporting flowers in cold storage, the vehicle losses decreased up to 11.75 percent and with metaled road decreased by about 3 percent (Table 3).…”
Section: Determinants Of Phl At Wholesaler Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%