1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0964-1955(96)00029-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in nasopharyngeal carcinoma tissue and its relation to clinical findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PCNA LI varies widely in our series, ranging from 6.5% to 92.9% (mean 53.4%). The result is consistent with the other studies [8,9,15,16]. Chan et al [8] reported that high PCNA LI was associated with a poorer disease-free survival, but PCNA LI has nothing to do with Ho's clinical staging or time required to achieve complete remission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The PCNA LI varies widely in our series, ranging from 6.5% to 92.9% (mean 53.4%). The result is consistent with the other studies [8,9,15,16]. Chan et al [8] reported that high PCNA LI was associated with a poorer disease-free survival, but PCNA LI has nothing to do with Ho's clinical staging or time required to achieve complete remission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The result is consistent with the other studies [8,9,15,16]. Chan et al [8] reported that high PCNA LI was associated with a poorer disease-free survival, but PCNA LI has nothing to do with Ho's clinical staging or time required to achieve complete remission. Tsai et al [10] reported that high PCNA LI was probably related to local relapse, but Genç et al [9] claimed that the PCNA LI was not correlated with prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its level reaches a maximum in the S phase, decreases during the M phase and it can not be detected in quiescent cells (Hall et al 1990;Bolton et al 1992). The frequency of PCNA-positive nuclei is of diagnostic importance, because its high expression proved to be correlated with a bad prognosis in a large number of tumour types, for example carcinomas of oral cavity (Staibano et al 1998), nasopharynx (Chan et al 1997), oesophagus (Kinugasa et al 1996), gaster (Isozaki et al 1998), colon and rectum (Nakae et al 1998), liver (Tannapfel et al 1999), bile duct (Suto et al 1997), larynx (Dobro et al 1998), lung (Lavezzi et al 1999, breast (Horita et al 2001), ovary (Thomas et al 1995), endometrium (Garzetti et al 1996), kidney (Sejima and Miyagawa 1999), bladder (Chen et al 1997) and thyroid gland (Omura et al 1997). The frequency of PCNA-positive nuclei is of diagnostic importance, because its high expression proved to be correlated with a bad prognosis in a large number of tumour types, for example carcinomas of oral cavity (Staibano et al 1998), nasopharynx (Chan et al 1997), oesophagus (Kinugasa et al 1996), gaster (Isozaki et al 1998), colon and rectum (Nakae et al 1998), liver (Tannapfel et al 1999), bile duct (Suto et al 1997), larynx (Dobro et al 1998), lung (Lavezzi et al 1999, breast (Horita et al 2001), ovary (Thomas et al 1995), endometrium (Garzetti et al 1996), kidney (Sejima and Miyagawa 1999), bladder (Chen et al 1997) and thyroid gland (Omura et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%