2005
DOI: 10.1177/1524839903260160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Public Health Educator Practice: Health Educator Responsibilities

Abstract: This study presents a method for better understanding how practicing health educators in local health departments spend their time. The purpose of this study was to document the daily practice of health educators in the 10 areas of responsibility as defined by a competency-based framework for graduate-level health educators. The results of the current study present the average percentage of time health educators spent carrying out each area of responsibility and the percentage of health educators that did not … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings on tasks performed by clinic health educators were similar to those found by Johnson et al (2005) for health educators employed by public health agencies. The health educators in this project spent 21.2% of their time in program planning and evaluation compared to 19.6% by the public health workers.…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Our findings on tasks performed by clinic health educators were similar to those found by Johnson et al (2005) for health educators employed by public health agencies. The health educators in this project spent 21.2% of their time in program planning and evaluation compared to 19.6% by the public health workers.…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Educational preparation, job responsibilities, and continuing education have been considered in regard to health education competencies. Johnson, Glascoff, Lovelace, Bibeau, and Tyler reported in 2005 that only 2.8% of health educator time in North Carolina was spent applying appropriate research principles and methods in health education and 58.1% of respondents reported not performing this activity at all (Jackson, Pitkin, & Kington, 1998;Johnson et al, 2005). Just more than 19% of responding health educators reported a need for continuing education focused on applying appropriate research principles (Price, Akpanudo, Dake, & Telljohann, 2004).…”
Section: > Health Educators In the Workforcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment instrument was divided into 4 sections: (a) rate how closely they followed activities (items 1a -1c); (b) report any changes that occurred during the class (items 2 -8); (c) rate their perceptions of the classroom process (items 9-16); and (d) report whether students talked about things other than the program, whether any students stated their intentions to quit, and how well they thought the session was conducted (items [17][18][19]. Sections 1 and 3 were 5-point Likert items asking health educators to state their level of agreement, and section 2 items were dichotomous (yes/no).…”
Section: He Assessment Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main concerns in a study comparing curricula is that health educators (HEs) will be biased in their preference for one program over another. 17 Thus a primary objective of this process evaluation was to determine whether the 2 curricula were implemented similarly as reported by HEs and observers. A second concern is that program delivery may be affected by HE characteristics, particularly HE experience.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%