2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2004.08.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of reactor vessel integrity (ARVI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary to our results, studies, available in the literature, have shown an increasing side wall heat flux with decreasing metal layer height (Theofanous et al, 1996;Rempe et al, 1997;Sehgal et al, 1999Sehgal et al, , 2000Sehgal et al, , 2005.…”
Section: Parameter Studies On the Thickness Of The Metal Layercontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the contrary to our results, studies, available in the literature, have shown an increasing side wall heat flux with decreasing metal layer height (Theofanous et al, 1996;Rempe et al, 1997;Sehgal et al, 1999Sehgal et al, , 2000Sehgal et al, , 2005.…”
Section: Parameter Studies On the Thickness Of The Metal Layercontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of the different results in (Sehgal et al, 1999(Sehgal et al, , 2005 and the analysis performed in this study shows, that the amount of heat, which is released from the melt surface by radiation appears to be the key phenomenon. In (Sehgal et al, 1999) the initial melt pool temperature (2000 K) was considerably lower than in this study, which results in a lower fraction of heat released through radiation.…”
Section: Parameter Studies On the Thickness Of The Metal Layermentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was concluded that an increased sulphur (S) content could be the reason for a rather brittle failure (low creep fracture strain 3 cr frac ), whereas low S provides a rather ductile failure with large necking and high creep fracture strains [59]. This effect could also be observed in the FOREVER test series [60] [61].…”
Section: Mechanical Behavior Of the Vesselmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to investigate integrity of lower head, several improvements have been done to current system codes to simulate thermal hydraulic behavior of molten materials in lower head, including MELCOR (Gauntt, 2005), SCDAP/RELAP5 (The SCDAP/RELAP5-3D Code Development Team, 2003), MAAP (MAAP code development Team, 1994), ATHLET-CD (Austregesilo, 2012). Alternatively, some codes are specially developed to evaluate integrity of the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) wall cooled from outside, such as VESSEL, MVITA (Sehgal et al, 2003), ERI-IVRAM (Esmaili and Khatib-Rahbar, 2004) and VESTA (Rempe et al, 1997). Since the temperature field of lower head is decisive factor in identifying the effectiveness of IVR This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%