2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-1721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Reflected Shock Tunnels for Mars Entry Vehicle Ground Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One standard deviation in the standoff distance measured in the movies is taken to be the uncertainty in standoff distance for these experiments. Experimental repeat measurements were within these ranges [33]. This corresponds to standard deviations in standoff distance measured from the high-speed videos during the experimental test time of 4.0 and 4.2% for the sphere experiments, and 8% for the sphere-cone experiment [34].…”
Section: Model Geometries and Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…One standard deviation in the standoff distance measured in the movies is taken to be the uncertainty in standoff distance for these experiments. Experimental repeat measurements were within these ranges [33]. This corresponds to standard deviations in standoff distance measured from the high-speed videos during the experimental test time of 4.0 and 4.2% for the sphere experiments, and 8% for the sphere-cone experiment [34].…”
Section: Model Geometries and Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A simulation was performed for each test using the experimentally measured reservoir pressure and shock velocity. A more detailed description of the method used to obtain the freestream conditions in T5 can be found in Leibowitz and Austin [33] and Leibowitz [34]. Experiments were conducted with a contoured nozzle that produces nominally uniform flow at the exit plane as well as a conical nozzle that produces diverging flow at the exit plane.…”
Section: A Hypervelocity Facilities 1 T5 Reflected Shock Tunnelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It also takes some time to start up the model, which will further shorten the efficient test time [16,17]. The T5 high-enthalpy shock tunnel at GALCIT (Graduate Astronautics Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA) [18] extended the duration by enlarging the equipment, but the effective test duration is still only 1 ms when it is running in high-enthalpy conditions (the total enthalpy is greater than 20 MJ/kg) [19,20]. Other well-known shock tunnels in the world, such as the HEG (High Enthalpy shock tunnel Göttingen) in Germany and HIEST (High-Enthalpy Shock Tunnel) in Japan, when operating under high-enthalpy conditions, the effective test duration is also around 1 ms [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%