2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(00)00217-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of requirements on safety management systems in EU regulations for the control of major hazard pipelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the system must promote a positive safety climate. To do this, strong commitment and support is required from all the managers in the firm (Civil Aviation Safety Authority, 2002;Zohar, 1980 Hale et al, 1997;Hurst, 1997;Joseph, Kaszniak, & Long, 2005;Khan & Amyotte, 2005;Kelly & Berger, 2006;McDonald, Corrigan, Daly, & Cromie, 2000;Papadakis, 2000;Rasmussen & Gronberg, 1997;Santos-Reyes & Beard, 2002). However, there have been few empirical studies to date, and no consensus has been achieved about the specific dimensions making up the safety management system.…”
Section: Safety Management System: Conceptualisation and Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the system must promote a positive safety climate. To do this, strong commitment and support is required from all the managers in the firm (Civil Aviation Safety Authority, 2002;Zohar, 1980 Hale et al, 1997;Hurst, 1997;Joseph, Kaszniak, & Long, 2005;Khan & Amyotte, 2005;Kelly & Berger, 2006;McDonald, Corrigan, Daly, & Cromie, 2000;Papadakis, 2000;Rasmussen & Gronberg, 1997;Santos-Reyes & Beard, 2002). However, there have been few empirical studies to date, and no consensus has been achieved about the specific dimensions making up the safety management system.…”
Section: Safety Management System: Conceptualisation and Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already explained, there are several databases that reflect different experience in gas pipeline networks in various countries or geographical regions. The most used and cited international pipeline incident databases are as follows: OPS (data from 1970 to 1990 in and from 1991 to 2011 in ), EGIG, UKOPA, and NEB…”
Section: A Brief Review Of Pipeline Incident Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes only a simple risk ranking, for example combining the likelihood of an event and the severity of its outcome, may be adequate for purposes of prioritization [10].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%