2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2019.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of residents’ perceptions and support toward development projects: A study of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But CPEC has no influence on quality of life (β = 0.029, p > 0.05) and also an insignificant influence on self-enhancement (β = 0.004, p > 0.05) which did not support H2 and H3, respectively. These findings are different than [ 4 ] and [ 3 ] because they claimed CPEC as a game-changer and driver of quality life. However, considering the suggestion of [ 68 ], who claimed that CPEC would first develop the areas which in turn would build an effective community, our findings also describe that CPEC would influence quality life and enhancement indirectly through the building and advancing the infrastructure.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultscontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…But CPEC has no influence on quality of life (β = 0.029, p > 0.05) and also an insignificant influence on self-enhancement (β = 0.004, p > 0.05) which did not support H2 and H3, respectively. These findings are different than [ 4 ] and [ 3 ] because they claimed CPEC as a game-changer and driver of quality life. However, considering the suggestion of [ 68 ], who claimed that CPEC would first develop the areas which in turn would build an effective community, our findings also describe that CPEC would influence quality life and enhancement indirectly through the building and advancing the infrastructure.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultscontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…But CPEC has no influence on quality of life (β = 0.029, p > 0.05) and also an insignificant influence on self-enhancement (β = 0.004, p > 0.05) which did not support H2 and H3, respectively. These findings are different than [4] and [3] because they claimed CPEC as a game-changer and driver of quality life. However, considering the suggestion of [68], who claimed that CPEC would first develop the areas…”
Section: Structural Modelmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Researchers have suggested that the positive attitude and support of the host community are essential for the success of a project's development. However, if road construction and other transportation-related developments lead to a loss of employment opportunities, lower living standards, human rights violations, and pollution, there could be unrest in society, which may lead to protests and conflicts [42][43][44][45][46][47]. Therefore, it is necessary to understand what the attitudes are within the local community regarding these development projects, whether locals are likely to support the CPEC projects, and how the projects are expected to influence their behaviors, attitudes, lifestyles, emotions, and well-being environmentally, culturally, socially, and economically.…”
Section: Perception and Level Of Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%