2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of residual stress of 7050-T7452 aluminum alloy forging using the contour method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results differ from the trends observed in the present work, the sample size and the extent of deformation and the thermal gradients could determine the actual trend observed. The through-thickness hardness and through thick residual stress appeared to follow the same trend in their work [5], and a similar trend is also seen in this work (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These results differ from the trends observed in the present work, the sample size and the extent of deformation and the thermal gradients could determine the actual trend observed. The through-thickness hardness and through thick residual stress appeared to follow the same trend in their work [5], and a similar trend is also seen in this work (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The mean error or uncertainty in the XRD residual stress measurements was 7.5 MPa and the range was 4 to 12 MPa. This kind of variations in the residual stresses measured has also been reported in the literature [5]. The longitudinal residual stresses in the cold compressed forging were reported to vary with the position along the length of the forging due to multiple compression and overlap [3], during post-quench cold compression stress relief [5].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations