2017
DOI: 10.1111/echo.13650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of right ventricular systolic function in heart transplant patients: Correlation between echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Investigation of the accuracy and reliability of echocardiography

Abstract: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study to evaluate the correlation between the echocardiographic parameters for RV systolic function and MRI RVEF in heart transplantation recipients. RV FAC is the only parameter to correlate well with MRI RVEF, and its routine use in the follow-up of heart transplantation recipients should be considered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Impairment of RV longitudinal systolic function was also reported by Simsek et al in 43 heart transplant patients. However, in this study RVEF quantified by CMR was preserved, which is consistent with the results of our study. The physiopathology of longitudinal RV systolic function alterations in post–heart transplantation is unclear but in the normal right ventricle, the majority of systolic functions are fulfilled by longitudinal contractions …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Impairment of RV longitudinal systolic function was also reported by Simsek et al in 43 heart transplant patients. However, in this study RVEF quantified by CMR was preserved, which is consistent with the results of our study. The physiopathology of longitudinal RV systolic function alterations in post–heart transplantation is unclear but in the normal right ventricle, the majority of systolic functions are fulfilled by longitudinal contractions …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the patients in whom the RVFAC was measured in the second evaluation (transplanted patients between 2018 and 2019), the immediate POP values showed RV dysfunction according to the cutoff point defined by the ASE (< 35%) 5 . However, these values showed an improvement from the 3 rd month, with levels close to those established in the literature, as normal, for patients with HTx (40-48%) 12,13 . These results showed the same behavior as other qualitative and quantitative parameters found in the medical records (Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…RV quantitative values obtained by 2D ETT compared with cMRI in patients undergoing HTx showed FAC as the value with the best correlation (r = 0.747, p < 0.001). FAC value ≤ 48.5% has a sensitivity and specificity of 90.5% to predict a reduce RV ejection fraction (< 50%) estimated by cMRI (AUC: 0.96; 95% CI, 0.908-1.013) 12 . This RVFAC cutoff point is higher than the previously of 35%, described as normal in the ASE guidelines 5 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…FAC is known to be well correlated with RVEF in a recent meta-analysis of cardiology studies [6]. In a recent study comparing MRI-based RVEF to echocardiographic indices in non-critically ill patients, FAC appeared to correlate with RVEF better than TAPSE [7]. FAC has the theoretical advantage to be a global index of RV function, incorporating both longitudinal and free-wall contractility [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%