Assessment of root surfaces of apicected teeth: A scanning electron microscopy evaluation

Ayrancı, Ferhat; Ayranci, LB; Arslan, Hakan; Omezli, MM; Topcu, M. K. C.

doi:10.4103/1119-3077.151041

Cited by 14 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Er:YAG lasers have less thermal effects 10 , cause no carbonisation, 15 improve sealing between dentin and epoxy sealer 10 , have fewer cracks, chippings, and burning effects when compared to Nd:YAG, CO 2 lasers 1,7-9 or ultrasonic tips. 2 Lasers produce smoother resected root surfaces 1,6 , less vibration -1.5 W power 11 , and less chipping compared to diamond burs 4 but are inferior to carbide burs. 6 Some authors believe that the use of burs is the best way to perform periapical surgery 5 because it leads to less inflammation 13 , has more bone fill, and takes less time.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2 Lasers produce smoother resected root surfaces 1,6 , less vibration -1.5 W power 11 , and less chipping compared to diamond burs 4 but are inferior to carbide burs. 6 Some authors believe that the use of burs is the best way to perform periapical surgery 5 because it leads to less inflammation 13 , has more bone fill, and takes less time. 3 Epoxy sealers lased with Er:YAG have less apical micro-leakage, compared to zinc oxide eugenol (ZEO) cements and root end prepared with ultrasonic tips.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some authors find no difference in permeability between roots resected with burs or lasers. Different power modes 6 , especially higher 400 mJ 8,9 , lead to different dentin sealing ability, different methylene blue permeability, irrespective of retrograde cavity materials like mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), super ethoxy benzoic acid (SuperEBA), intermediate restorative material (IRM). Results are better, compared to retrograde cavities prepared with ultrasonic tips.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It leads to lower clinical survival. 1 Lasers may enhance periapical surgery 2,3 and periodontal therapy 4 , by requiring less tools, 5 less time, providing surgical field disinfection, sealing of tubules 1,[6][7][8][9][10] , enhanced bone healing, and a shorter recovery period. [11][12][13] We present a case with a periapical cyst and multiple infarossal defects simultaneously treated with erbium doped yttrium aluminium garnet-Er:YAG laser.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Simultaneous Perio-endo Surgery with ER:YAG Laser and Bone Xenograft. A Case Report

Krastev

Filipov

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Periodontally affected teeth with periapical lesion indicated for periapical surgery have a poor prognosis. Using Er:YAG lasers to perform simultaneous surgery on both defects may increase their survival rate. Preparing a retrograde cavity on affected teeth and obturating it is still a matter of debate among clinicians. The purpose of this case report was to describe the simultaneous use of Erbium-doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet Er:YAG (2,940 nm) laser in the treatment of periapical granuloma and infraossal defect and the achieved results. The Er:YAG laser was used to perform flap dissection, granulation tissue removal, osteotomy and root-end resection except for initial flap incision and reflection. The cystic cavity was filled with Bio-Oss Collagen® xenograft. Results were followed up for 18 months with the help of radiographic orthopantomographic images. The outcome of this clinical case indicates that the use of Er:YAG laser could be considered a suitable method to perform simultaneous periodontal and endodontic surgery.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Simultaneous Perio-endo Surgery with ER:YAG Laser and Bone Xenograft. A Case Report

Krastev

Filipov

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…When disinfection is difficult with routine infected root canal treatment, anti-biofilm [28] and antimicrobial procedures with an Er:YAG laser is expected to be beneficial [29,30] [31] discussed about SEM observations between conventional group and laser-irradiated groups. The anti-biofilm actions of Er:YAG laser might be due to absorption of water in biofilms, and small numbers of residual viable cells might undergo thermal necrosis.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multiple Applications with Er:YAG Laser in Apicoectomy - A Clinical Case Report

Yu¹

2017

Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The setting was 50 mJ/10 Hz with 100% of water for full mouth laser scaling and then ultrasonic scaling tip was used for supragingival scaling. In addition, another laser setting was applied at 50 mJ/30Hz with 100% of water for subgingival sterilization and then ultrasonic round tip was used for subgingival curettage [7,8]. Step 2. Vertical soft tissue incisionThe setting was 100 mJ/40 Hz with 100% of water for incision [in vestibular near apex of #21] (Figure 3). Step 3. Granulation tissues ablationThe setting was 400 mJ/15Hz with 100% of water. Granulation tissues were ablation thoroughly (Figures 4 and 5).

show abstract

Resistance to vertical root fracture of apicoected teeth using different devices during two root canal irrigation procedures

Ayrancı

Özdoğan

et al. 2018

Lasers Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the present work was to measure the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth that were apicoected with different procedures. Seventy-two extracted human maxillary anterior teeth were included in this study. The specimens were randomly assigned to three main groups according to the apical surgery procedures and then two subgroups according to the irrigation protocols during root canal treatment and total of six groups were obtained (n = 12). Group 1: served as a control and apical surgery process was not performed in this group. Group 2: apical surgery process was performed with tungsten carbide fissure bur Group 3: apical surgery process was performed with Er:YAG laser. Subgroup a: In this group, the specimens were irrigated with %5 NaOCl. Subgroup b: 15% EDTA solution was filled into the root canal and then agitated using a 1.5 W/100 Hz diode laser. The specimens were filled and mounted in acrylic resin blocks and compression strength test was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA. The statistical analysis revealed that there were no statistical significant differences between apical surgery procedures (groups 1, 2, and 3) (p < 0.05). Apical resection procedures did not affect the fracture resistance Significant differences were determined between the subgroups (p < 0.05). Agitation of the EDTA with the diode laser reduced the fracture resistance of the specimens. The different canal irrigation techniques altered resistance to fracture; however, apical surgery procedures did not altered the resistance to fracture when compared with the control group.

show abstract

Assessment of root surfaces of apicected teeth: A scanning electron microscopy evaluation

Abstract: Under the tested conditions smoother surfaces were observed in the groups treated with the tungsten carbide bur and Er: YAG laser when compared with the diamond-coated tips.

Cited by 14 publications

References 24 publications

Simultaneous Perio-endo Surgery with ER:YAG Laser and Bone Xenograft. A Case Report

Simultaneous Perio-endo Surgery with ER:YAG Laser and Bone Xenograft. A Case Report

Multiple Applications with Er:YAG Laser in Apicoectomy - A Clinical Case Report

Resistance to vertical root fracture of apicoected teeth using different devices during two root canal irrigation procedures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About