2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of safety of self-controlled repetitive trans-vertebral magnetic stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings indicate that TVMS requires an optimal intensity of approximately ≥40% MSO to evoke bilateral rhythmic walking-like leg movements. On the basis of our previous work (Sasada et al, 2021) and verbal feedback from the current study participants, this intensity did not cause an unpleasant sensation, suggesting that TVMS can be a good alternative approach to restore impaired gait function and encourage recovery in individuals in whom epidural stimulation is not available. We intend to investigate the input-output properties of TVMS and its neurophysiological impacts on the spinal locomotor circuitry in individuals with SCI to develop a new rehabilitation therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings indicate that TVMS requires an optimal intensity of approximately ≥40% MSO to evoke bilateral rhythmic walking-like leg movements. On the basis of our previous work (Sasada et al, 2021) and verbal feedback from the current study participants, this intensity did not cause an unpleasant sensation, suggesting that TVMS can be a good alternative approach to restore impaired gait function and encourage recovery in individuals in whom epidural stimulation is not available. We intend to investigate the input-output properties of TVMS and its neurophysiological impacts on the spinal locomotor circuitry in individuals with SCI to develop a new rehabilitation therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…For individuals with severe SCI, electrical stimulation with chronically implanted epidural electrodes has been successful in restoring lost locomotor function (Angeli et al, 2018;Gill et al, 2018;Rowald et al, 2022). Compared with epidural stimulation, percutaneous spinal stimulation with electric or magnetic pulses has a lower risk of adverse events (Laskin et al, 2022), which is supported by our recent work showing that the use of repetitive TVMS under closed-loop control induces no serious adverse events in individuals with chronic SCI and uninjured healthy adults (Sasada et al, 2021). Additionally, magnetic stimulation generates less discomfort compared with percutaneous electrical stimulation due to lower current density in the skin, allowing for high frequency stimulation with suprathreshold intensity for leg muscles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%