2015
DOI: 10.15430/jcp.2015.20.3.208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Salivary Flow Rate and pH Among Areca Nut Chewers and Oral Submucous Fibrosis Subjects: A Comparative Study

Abstract: Background:To assess and compare the salivary flow rate (SFR) and salivary pH among areca nut chewers, oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) patients and apparently healthy individuals.Methods:A comparative study was conducted to assess and compare the SFR and pH among 135 outpatients (45 areca nut chewers + 45 OSMF + 45 control) at The Oxford Dental College and Research Hospital, Bangalore, India. Subjects were interviewed using structural proforma and Modified Schirmer strips and pH paper were implemented for asses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In studies done by Sangeetha et al, (2014) have shown that the salivary pH has less significance with the tobacco chewing habits (areca nut) when compared with patients having Oral potentially malignant disorders like oral submucous Fibrosis, and healthy individuals [6]. Studies done by Khader et al,(2015) in contraindication have shown a rise in Salivary pH among a group of Areca nut chewers and oral submucous fibrosis group in which the mean value of was 6.76, 6.82 and 6.74 for areca nut chewers , OSMF and healthy subjects respectively, although the number of subjects in the study were about 135, the results of this study has proven that there is less significance of salivary pH among the tobacco consumers and non-consumers(Healthy subjects), but a significance was found only by mean salivary flow rate [7]. In other studies, done by Farsi NM.,(2007) have shown that the pH varies based on the flow rate of the saliva, but the mean difference were very insignificant as both the cases and controls had the same level of salivary pH about 7.38, but were done in normal patients only, but with only dry mouth and dry mucosa unlike the current study [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In studies done by Sangeetha et al, (2014) have shown that the salivary pH has less significance with the tobacco chewing habits (areca nut) when compared with patients having Oral potentially malignant disorders like oral submucous Fibrosis, and healthy individuals [6]. Studies done by Khader et al,(2015) in contraindication have shown a rise in Salivary pH among a group of Areca nut chewers and oral submucous fibrosis group in which the mean value of was 6.76, 6.82 and 6.74 for areca nut chewers , OSMF and healthy subjects respectively, although the number of subjects in the study were about 135, the results of this study has proven that there is less significance of salivary pH among the tobacco consumers and non-consumers(Healthy subjects), but a significance was found only by mean salivary flow rate [7]. In other studies, done by Farsi NM.,(2007) have shown that the pH varies based on the flow rate of the saliva, but the mean difference were very insignificant as both the cases and controls had the same level of salivary pH about 7.38, but were done in normal patients only, but with only dry mouth and dry mucosa unlike the current study [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have estimated a range of 5.4 to 7.8, the increase in pH is based on the increase in salivary flow rate (SFR) [4][5][6] . Clinical and epidemiological studies showed that, potentially malignant disorder associated with areca nut chewing has been associated with decrease in salivary pH (acidic pH) [7] . The increase in salivary flow, helps in the proper cleansing action of the oral cavity, thereby regulating the salivary pH in normal levels [8]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tobacco usage also leads to inactivation of taste receptors by nicotine, thereby depressing salivary reflex. [ 1 , 18 , 21 , 26 ] Nicotine also altered secretion of saliva by acting or specific cholinergic receptors in the brain and other organs, causing neural activation. [ 15 , 21 , 22 ] Reduced SFR is also because of parasympathominetic activity of arecoline, probably because of lime, which converts arecoline to arecaidene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdul Khader and Dyasanoor [ 26 ] conducted a study to evaluate and compare the salivary flow rate and pH among 135 outpatients (45 areca nut chewers, 45 OSMF, and 45 controls). A statistically significant increase in salivary flow rate (35.7 mm at 3 rd min) among areca nut group and a decrease in salivary flow rate among OSMF group (23.4 mm at 3 rd min) when compared to apparently healthy participants (30.7 mm at 3 rd min) were observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%