1996
DOI: 10.1016/0268-0033(96)00025-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of scoliotic deformity from back shape asymmetry using an improved mathematical model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
62
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
62
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Worthy of note, the correlation between the two methods was similar in patients with a Cobb angle \30°and C30°, confirming that in our group of patients presenting a Cobb angle \50° [19], the rasterstereography is a reliable method for VR evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Worthy of note, the correlation between the two methods was similar in patients with a Cobb angle \30°and C30°, confirming that in our group of patients presenting a Cobb angle \50° [19], the rasterstereography is a reliable method for VR evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Among these techniques, rasterstereography provides a reliable method for three-dimensional back shape analysis and reconstruction of spinal deformities without radiation exposure [19]. Rasterstereography is a method for stereophotogrammetric surface measuring of the back, originally developed by Drerup and Hierholzer [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methods range from tactile measurements such as the scoliometer [7] and the spinal rotation meter [21] to optical methods such as moiré topography [1,13] and structured light techniques, the most well known being ISIS (Integrated Shape Imaging System) [28], Quantec [12,14,20] and Jenoptik Formetric [9][10][11]. All were successfully applied to the monitoring of scoliosis and are still in use at some clinics, but they were no longer being actively marketed in the UK at the time this work began.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The position of the centre of the vertebrae is reconstructed with an accuracy of 3.9 mm [6], in comparison with radiographic scans. Compared with the method of Drerup and Hierholzer, the described system has a similar accuracy: a lateral deviation of the spine of 0.9 mm and an axial rotation of the spine of 0.4…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%