2013
DOI: 10.5194/hess-17-1297-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of shallow subsurface characterisation with non-invasive geophysical methods at the intermediate hill-slope scale

Abstract: Abstract. Hill-slopes of several hectares in size represent a difficult scale for subsurface characterisation, as these landscape units are well beyond the scope of traditional pointscale techniques. By means of electromagnetic induction (EMI) and gamma-ray spectroscopy, spatially distributed soil proxy data were collected from a heterogeneous hill-slope site. Results of EMI mapping using the EM38DD showed that soil electrical conductivity (ECa) is highly variable at both temporal and spatial scales. Calibrati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides hydrogeophysical methods such as electromagnetics (EM) (Popp et al, 2013;Robinson et al, 2012;Trompvan Meerveld and McDonnell, 2009), time-lapse ERT have been frequently applied to hillslope investigation in the runoff and interflow (Uhlenbrook et al, 2008;Cassiani et al, 2009) or preferential flow context (Leslie and Heinse, 2013).…”
Section: R Hübner Et Al: Monitoring Hillslope Moisture Dynamics Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides hydrogeophysical methods such as electromagnetics (EM) (Popp et al, 2013;Robinson et al, 2012;Trompvan Meerveld and McDonnell, 2009), time-lapse ERT have been frequently applied to hillslope investigation in the runoff and interflow (Uhlenbrook et al, 2008;Cassiani et al, 2009) or preferential flow context (Leslie and Heinse, 2013).…”
Section: R Hübner Et Al: Monitoring Hillslope Moisture Dynamics Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a specii c limitation arises also from high sensitivity of the acquisition system to environmental conditions and limited calibration accuracy, which is both regarded as system specii c. However, we expect that also other EMI systems or even some soils may exhibit a more or less prominent and rapid reaction on changing environmental conditions during surveys lasting several days. Hence, for future work over heterogeneous ground, we see more potential in assessing soil moisture on the basis of multi-physical information, that is, by combining dif erent physical parameter variation maps in an automated fashion with sparse target parameters avoiding the explicit deterministic formulation of specii c inter-parameter relationships, for example, as used by Paasche and Eberle (2010) or Popp et al (2013).…”
Section: Determinisi C Transfer Funci Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysical methods which are usually noninvasive have proven to be very vital tools for analysing and characterising the subsurface conditions for groundwater and engineering applications due to their large sampling rate (Giao et al 2003;Papadopoulos et al 2006;Soupios et al 2007;Anderson et al 2008;Popp et al 2013). Moreso, the geophysical methods have been reported to enhance the reliability, speed, and reduction in cost of geotechnical investigations (Anderson et al 2008;Arjwech and Everett 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%