Assessment of short and long-term outcomes of diabetes patient education using the health education impact questionnaire (HeiQ)

Abstract

BackgroundType 2 diabetes is a progressive chronic illness that will affect more than 500 million people worldwide by 2030. It is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Finding the right care management for diabetes patients is necessary to effectively address the growing population of affected individuals and escalating costs. Patient education is one option for improving patient self-management. However, there are large discrepancies in the outcomes of such programs and long-term data are lacking. We assessed the short and long-term outcomes of diabetes patient education using the health education impact questionnaire (HeiQ).MethodsWe conducted a observational cohort study of 83 type 2 diabetes patients participating in patient education programs in Denmark. The seven-scale HeiQ was completed by telephone interview at baseline and 2 weeks (76 participants, 93%) and 12 months (66, 80%) after the patient education ended. Changes over time were assessed using mean values and standard deviation at each time point and Cohen effect sizes.ResultsPatients reported improvements 2 weeks after the program ended in 4 of 7 constructs: skills and technique acquisition (ES = 0.59), self-monitoring and insight (ES = 0.52), constructive attitudes and approaches (ES = 0.43) and social integration and support (ES = 0.27). After 12 months, patients reported improvements in 3 of 7 constructs: skills and technique acquisition (ES = 0.66), constructive attitudes and approaches (ES = 0.43), and emotional wellbeing (ES = 0.44). Skills and technique showed the largest short- and long-term effect size. No significant changes were found in health-related activity or positive and active engagement in life over time.ConclusionAfter 12 months, diabetes patients who participated in patient education demonstrated increased self-management skills, improved acceptance of their chronic illness and decreased negative emotional response to their disease. Applying HeiQ as an outcome measure yielded new knowledge as to what patients with diabetes can obtain by participating in a patient education.

Clinical inertia is the enemy of therapeutic success in the management of diabetes and its complications: a narrative literature review

“…Proactive approaches with patients also prove useful, as patients respond better when they feel they contribute to a positive outcome [58]. The involvement of nurses, pharmacists, and other members of multidisciplinary teams in the management of the disease has proved effective [59] to help respond to patients' needs and problems regarding their condition. Education end access to updated information on new drugs, including efficacy and adverse reactions, must be constantly available for healthcare professionals, as well as clear guidelines that can guide therapeutic choices.…”

Addressing Clinical Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Review

“…DSME programs have proven successful in reducing clinical inertia. For example, patients with diabetes who took part in a 1-year health professional-provided education program were more accepting of their chronic illness and showed improvements in self-management skills and decreased negative emotional response to their disease [ 46 ]. Implementing referrals to CDEs and patient support programs do not induce a financial strain on HCPs as reimbursements for these programs are available from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and most commercial healthcare plans [ 47 ].…”

Relationship Between Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and the Severity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Context of an Innovative Digitally Supported 24-Hour Service: Longitudinal Study (Preprint)

“…One heiQ dimension, Emotional distress, is normally reported as impact of distress meaning a high score reflects a high impact of distress [12]. For this study as well as in Laursen et al [23] the scale is reversed for ease of interpretation. In this way a high score means less distress and a low score a more distress.…”

“…Health service navigation, can be used to characterize levels of empowerment in people with cancer. The Tecently, heiQ has been used in Denmark to evaluate education in diabetes [23], and impacts of telemedicine [24] and in Norway to access self-management in COPD [2].…”