Assessment of shoulder active range of motion in prone versus supine: a reliability and concurrent validity study

Furness, James; Johnstone, Scott; Hing, Wayne; Abbott, Allan; Climstein, Mike

doi:10.3109/09593985.2015.1027070

Cited by 23 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The intra-examiner values in this study (>0.80) for both internal and external rotation were superior to some (Awan, Smith, & Boon, 2002;Walker, et al, 2016) but slightly lower than others that have reported ICC values of greater than 0.9 (Cools, et al, 2014;Furness, et al, 2015) using an inclinometer. The good to excellent reliability values found for inter-examiner assessment are similar to previous studies that have also found good to excellent reliability values both in swimmers (Riemann, et al, 2011;Walker, et al, 2016) and non-swimmers (Cools, et al, 2014;Furness, et al, 2015). The generally low levels of SEM in this study indicate consistency across testing sessions and between examiners for this test battery and compare favorably to previous reliability studies that have reported SEM values of 2-5° for active shoulder movements (Kolber, Vega Jr, Widmayer, & Cheng, 2011;Walker, et al, 2016).…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 74%

“…When comparing our results to previous ROM reliability studies only a few measures can be accurately scrutinized, as although some of the tests within this battery are used routinely within swimming screenings and clinical assessments (Blanch, 2004), there is a paucity of literature examining their reliability. Shoulder internal rotation and external rotation are two exceptions as they are measures that have received repeated attention within the literature (Cools, et al, 2014;Furness, Johnstone, Hing, Abbott, & Climstein, 2015;Riemann, Witt, & Davies, 2011;Walker, et al, 2016). The intra-examiner values in this study (>0.80) for both internal and external rotation were superior to some (Awan, Smith, & Boon, 2002;Walker, et al, 2016) but slightly lower than others that have reported ICC values of greater than 0.9 (Cools, et al, 2014;Furness, et al, 2015) using an inclinometer.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 50%

“…Shoulder internal rotation and external rotation are two exceptions as they are measures that have received repeated attention within the literature (Cools, et al, 2014;Furness, Johnstone, Hing, Abbott, & Climstein, 2015;Riemann, Witt, & Davies, 2011;Walker, et al, 2016). The intra-examiner values in this study (>0.80) for both internal and external rotation were superior to some (Awan, Smith, & Boon, 2002;Walker, et al, 2016) but slightly lower than others that have reported ICC values of greater than 0.9 (Cools, et al, 2014;Furness, et al, 2015) using an inclinometer. The good to excellent reliability values found for inter-examiner assessment are similar to previous studies that have also found good to excellent reliability values both in swimmers (Riemann, et al, 2011;Walker, et al, 2016) and non-swimmers (Cools, et al, 2014;Furness, et al, 2015).…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 50%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Establishing the reliability of a novel battery of range of motion tests to enable evidence-based classification in Para Swimming

Nicholson

Spathis

Hogarth

et al. 2018

Physical Therapy in Sport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 74%

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 50%

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 50%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Establishing the reliability of a novel battery of range of motion tests to enable evidence-based classification in Para Swimming

Nicholson

Spathis

Hogarth

et al. 2018

Physical Therapy in Sport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…12,15,31 In the present study, a digital goniometer was used (HALO Medical Devices), combined with a universal goniometer with prolonged arms to measure ROM. 8,11,12,15 A few times, when held horizontally, the digital goniometer was shown to measure angles higher than the universal goniometer. The measurements of hip internal rotation in the supine position were therefore made using both the digital goniometer and a universal goniometer.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Range of Hip Joint Motion Is Correlated With MRI-Verified Cam Deformity in Adolescent Elite Skiers

Agnvall

Aminoff

Todd

et al. 2017

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:Radiologically verified cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has been shown to correlate with reduced internal rotation, reduced passive hip flexion, and a positive anterior impingement test.Purpose:To validate how a clinical examination of the hip joint correlates with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–verified cam deformity in adolescents.Study Design:Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:The sample group consisted of 102 adolescents with the mean age 17.7 ± 1.4 years. The hip joints were examined using MRI for measurements of the presence of cam (α-angle ≥55°) and clinically for range of motion (ROM) in both supine and sitting positions. The participants were divided into a cam and a noncam group based on the results of the MRI examination. Passive hip flexion, internal rotation, anterior impingement, and the FABER (flexion, abduction, and external rotation) test were used to test both hips in the supine position. With the participant sitting, the internal/external rotation of the hip joint was measured in 3 different positions of the pelvis (neutral, maximum anteversion, and retroversion) and lumbar spine (neutral, maximum extension, and flexion).Results:Differences were found between the cam and noncam groups in terms of the anterior impingement test (right, P = .010; left, P = .006), passive supine hip flexion (right: mean, 5°; cam, 117°; noncam, 122° [P = .05]; and left: mean, 8.5°; cam, 116°; noncam, 124.5° [P = .001]), supine internal rotation (right: mean, 4.9°; cam, 24°; noncam, 29° [P = .022]; and left: mean, 4.8°; cam, 26°; noncam, 31° [P = .028]), sitting internal rotation with the pelvis and lumbar spine in neutral (right: mean, 7.95°; cam, 29°; noncam, 37° [P = .001]; and left: mean, 6.5°; cam, 31.5°; noncam, 38° [P = .006]), maximum anteversion of the pelvis and extension of the lumbar spine (right: mean, 5.2°; cam, 20°; noncam, 25° [P = .004]; and left: mean, 5.85°; cam, 20.5; noncam, 26.4° [P = .004]), and maximum retroversion of the pelvis and flexion of the spine (right: mean, 8.4°; cam, 32.5°; noncam, 41° [P = .001]; and left: mean, 6.2°; cam, 36°; noncam, 42.3° [P = .012]). The cam group had reduced ROM compared with the noncam group in all clinical ROM measures.Conclusion:The presence of cam deformity on MRI correlates with reduced internal rotation in the supine and sitting positions, passive supine hip flexion, and the impingement test in adolescents.

show abstract

“…Ainsi, le type d'application utilisée devrait être toujours le même pour limiter les risques d'erreurs inhérents à l'outil [11]. Les points de repère sur les patients doivent être strictement les mêmes, ainsi que la position choisie, pour limiter les erreurs liée aux physiothérapeutes [38,42]. Enfin les tests devraient être réalisés dans des conditions similaires pour les patients (environnement, heure, activités concomitantes, …) [8].…”

Section: Au Niveau De L'épaule Ce Sont éGalement Les Mesures D'abducunclassified

Validité et reproductibilité des applications téléphoniques pour évaluer les amplitudes de mouvement en pratique clinique : revue de littérature

Bruyneel

2018

Kinésithérapie, la Revue

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Validité et reproductibilité des applications téléphoniques pour évaluer les amplitudes de mouvement en pratique clinique: revue de littérature Résumé Objectifs : Revue de littérature sur les tests de validité et de reproductibilités (intra et interévaluateurs) des applications sur smartphone permettant de mesurer une amplitude de mouvement en degrés. Méthode : Les articles, en anglais et en français, ont été cherchés en utilisant les mots clés : « healthy subjects », « phone », « range of motion », validity », « reliability » et « repeatability » sur les bases de données PubMed / Medline, ScienceDirect, Pedro et Kinedoc. Une synthèse a été réalisée et chaque étude a été évaluée par le score Qarel. Résultats : Au total, 512 études ont été identifiées. Suite aux différentes étapes de sélection, 18 articles ont été recrutés. 5 articles sur le rachis, 6 articles sur le membre inférieur et 7 articles sur le membre supérieur. Au total, 601 sujets asymptomatiques ont été testés. Le score Qarel moyen était de 7.61/12 (min :6/ max :9). Discussion et conclusion : Les applications téléphoniques goniométriques et inclinométriques peuvent être utilisées pour mesurer des amplitudes de mouvement. Néanmoins, ces applications doivent être utilisées avec précaution pour les rotations cervicales et de hanches, pour les mouvements de l'hallux et de l'épaule. Mots clés : Amplitude articulaire -applications -smartphone -validité -reproductibilitérevue 2 Validity and reliability of phone applications for range of motion measurement in clinical practice: Literature review Abstract Aim: Literature review about validity and reliability (intra and inter-raters) of range of motion angle tests with goniometer or inclinometer smartphone application. Method: The research was conducted, in french and english, using keywords « healthy subjects », « phone », « range of motion », validity », « reliability » et « repeatability » on the databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Pedro and Kinedoc. A synthesis was carried out and each study was evaluated by the Qarel score.Results: 512 articles were identified. Following the selection criteria, 18 articles were included, with 5 for cervical and lumbar motions, 6 for lower limb and 7 for upper limb. These studies included 601 healthy subjects. The mean Qarel score was 7.61/12 (min:6/max:9). Discussion and conclusion:Goniometric and inclinometric smartphone applications can be used to measure range of motion. However, these applications should be used with caution for cervical and hip rotations, for hallux movements and on the shoulder. Validité et reproductibilité des applications téléphoniques pour évaluer lesamplitudes mouvement en pratique clinique: revue de littérature

show abstract

Assessment of shoulder active range of motion in prone versus supine: a reliability and concurrent validity study

Abstract: Climstein, M. (2015). Assessment of shoulder active range of motion in prone versus supine: a reliability and concurrent validity study.

Cited by 23 publications

References 17 publications

Establishing the reliability of a novel battery of range of motion tests to enable evidence-based classification in Para Swimming

Establishing the reliability of a novel battery of range of motion tests to enable evidence-based classification in Para Swimming

Range of Hip Joint Motion Is Correlated With MRI-Verified Cam Deformity in Adolescent Elite Skiers

Validité et reproductibilité des applications téléphoniques pour évaluer les amplitudes de mouvement en pratique clinique : revue de littérature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About