2020
DOI: 10.15243/jdmlm.2020.072.2049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of soil degradation in Pitu District, Ngawi Regency

Abstract: This study aimed to determine the status of soil damage in Pitu District, Ngawi Regency. The study was conducted in a descriptive exploratory with survey methods. Determination of site sampling was done by purposive sampling, based on distribution or division and land use categories from the results of map overlays. Assessment of soil degradation potency was based on land units from the uniformity of the soil, rainfall, slope, and land use map. Land units resulting from overlay were scored based on the results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…150 of 2000 combined by previous researchers (Aji et al, 2020), including rainfall, slope, land conservation, land use, flooding, pH, electrical conductivity, soil depth, surface rock, and sand fraction. Several other researchers also used the same method (Widiatiningsih et al, 2018;Mujiyo et al, 2020) in determining the potential of soil degradation. The ten parameters of the soil degradation index were then scored according to previous researchers (Aji et al, 2020), where the scoring results would be classified as very good (≥46%), good (36-45%), moderate (28-35%), damaged (17-27%), and heavily damaged (<16%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…150 of 2000 combined by previous researchers (Aji et al, 2020), including rainfall, slope, land conservation, land use, flooding, pH, electrical conductivity, soil depth, surface rock, and sand fraction. Several other researchers also used the same method (Widiatiningsih et al, 2018;Mujiyo et al, 2020) in determining the potential of soil degradation. The ten parameters of the soil degradation index were then scored according to previous researchers (Aji et al, 2020), where the scoring results would be classified as very good (≥46%), good (36-45%), moderate (28-35%), damaged (17-27%), and heavily damaged (<16%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservation techniques on steep slopes, improvement of soil with water and nutrient retention, and provision of organic matter and microorganisms are efforts that can be made to reduce soil degradation and improve soil quality (Noviyanto et al, 2017). Many previous researchers in Indonesia have conducted soil degradation assessments (Widiatiningsih et al, 2018;Aji et al, 2020;Mujiyo et al, 2020), but few have combined the linkages between soil degradation and NDVI and TRI. Zhumanova et al (2018) used NDVI to determine degraded vegetation types, while Noviyanto et al (2020) used TRI to determine land degradation threats such as erosion and landslides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%