2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of streamwater age using water stable isotopes in a headwater catchment of the central Tibetan Plateau

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, at sampling site G3 in the YZR, which is geographically close to the research basin of S. Wang, He, Kang, Hong, et al. (2023), the SPG MTT in G3 (113 days) was consistent with the streamflow MTT (107 days) in that study, whereas the F yw of the G3 watershed streamflow (0.151) was significantly lower than that of the SPG (0.548). This further demonstrates that streamflow in permafrost regions is replenished by the mixing and transformation of various water bodies within the active layer (Gui et al., 2023), resulting in smaller amplitude variations in streamflow isotopes compared to those in the SPG (the magnitude of isotopic variations in streamflow and SPG is illustrated in Figures 4 and 6, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Second, at sampling site G3 in the YZR, which is geographically close to the research basin of S. Wang, He, Kang, Hong, et al. (2023), the SPG MTT in G3 (113 days) was consistent with the streamflow MTT (107 days) in that study, whereas the F yw of the G3 watershed streamflow (0.151) was significantly lower than that of the SPG (0.548). This further demonstrates that streamflow in permafrost regions is replenished by the mixing and transformation of various water bodies within the active layer (Gui et al., 2023), resulting in smaller amplitude variations in streamflow isotopes compared to those in the SPG (the magnitude of isotopic variations in streamflow and SPG is illustrated in Figures 4 and 6, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In a previous study, the water age was calculated for 254 streams worldwide, revealing an average F yw of 0.26, with 89% > 0.05 (Jasechko et al., 2016). Recent studies calculated the F yw of streamflow for several small basins with permafrost, resulting in values of 0.151 (Song et al., 2017), 0.23 (Yang et al., 2021), 0.3 (S. Wang, He, Kang, Yan, et al., 2023), and 0.151 (S. Wang, He, Kang, Hong, et al., 2023), which are consistent with the results of this study (Table 2). These findings indicate that the F yw of streamflow in permafrost regions is generally lower than that of global rivers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Fyw in Hehuan streams, which ranged from 19% to 38%, is comparable to values reported in other alpine environments. For example, in the alpine grasslands of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in western China, Fyw values ranged from 18% to 39% as reported in various studies (Song et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2023;Yang et al, 2021). In Switzerland, a Fyw of 34% was noted (Ceperley et al, 2020).…”
Section: Seepage Water Have More Young Water But No Different New Wat...mentioning
confidence: 84%