2001
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2001.1746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of strength and willingness to fight during aggressive encounters in crickets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
116
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
116
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This proposition is supported by field data (Holzer et al 2003) and laboratory data (Scheuber et al 2003), which reveal carrier frequency and chirp rate to be uncorrelated calling-song characteristics. This also suggests that, although size asymmetry is an important factor determining resourceholding potential in field crickets (Alexander 1961;Hofmann & Schildberger 2001), variation in past condition does not affect variation in current condition. Summarizing, calling-song characteristics of field crickets do not merely contain redundant information on overall male quality, as predicted by the redundant signals hypothesis (Møller & Pomiankowski 1993;Johnstone 1996;Candolin Proc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This proposition is supported by field data (Holzer et al 2003) and laboratory data (Scheuber et al 2003), which reveal carrier frequency and chirp rate to be uncorrelated calling-song characteristics. This also suggests that, although size asymmetry is an important factor determining resourceholding potential in field crickets (Alexander 1961;Hofmann & Schildberger 2001), variation in past condition does not affect variation in current condition. Summarizing, calling-song characteristics of field crickets do not merely contain redundant information on overall male quality, as predicted by the redundant signals hypothesis (Møller & Pomiankowski 1993;Johnstone 1996;Candolin Proc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This result rests on the assumption that males can detect their chances of winning a fight by evaluating the situation or the competitor. Such an ability of competing males has been shown in various animal species from insects to mammals (Davies & Halliday 1978;Clutton-Brock & Albon 1979;Panhuis & Wilkinson 1999;Schuck-Paim 2000;Hofmann & Schildberger 2001). I therefore suppose that it is likely that at least a behavioural programme such as 'attack if you surprise your rival' or 'attack if bigger' evolves that leads to attacks only when a certain fighting threshold is exceeded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although the behavior strength had been applied to assess the effects of environment stressor on the behavior of some organisms [5,14], there was not a precise concept yet. In this study, behavior strength is defined as the intensity of behavior parameters representing motility.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%