2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtte.2017.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of strength development in stabilized soil with CBR PLUS and silica sand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the values corresponding to those with the stone dust were higher compared to those with the bagasse ash, which implies that the soil stabilized with stone dust produced lower penetration-susceptibility. Considering the findings of Mousavi and Karamvand [42], the above observation may be justified with the possible chemical reaction between the soil particles and admixtures. The admixtures probably attributed to cementing effects on the soil, increasing their penetration resistance, thereby increasing the CBR; such cementing efficiency appeared to be more in the case of stone dust.…”
Section: Soil Stabilized By Stone Dustmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Furthermore, the values corresponding to those with the stone dust were higher compared to those with the bagasse ash, which implies that the soil stabilized with stone dust produced lower penetration-susceptibility. Considering the findings of Mousavi and Karamvand [42], the above observation may be justified with the possible chemical reaction between the soil particles and admixtures. The admixtures probably attributed to cementing effects on the soil, increasing their penetration resistance, thereby increasing the CBR; such cementing efficiency appeared to be more in the case of stone dust.…”
Section: Soil Stabilized By Stone Dustmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…They also used nano polymers such as CBR PLUS to stabilize granular bases, with results similar to those mentioned above, with increases of up to 6 times with the addition of 1% CBR PLUS and 9% silica sand; in terms of costs, it was concluded that a high initial investment is required, but low during its lifetime due to maintenance effects, according to the economic evaluation carried out [49], [50].…”
Section: Use Of Nanotechnology To Stabilize Soilsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It is reported that when the compaction energy was increased, there was an increase in MDD and a decrease in OMC of soil [37][38][39]. The soil particles could be closer when increasing the compaction energy, leading to the reduction of void spaces between soil particles and the amount of water occupying the void spaces.…”
Section: Standard Proctor Compaction Test (Spct)mentioning
confidence: 99%