2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tdj.2015.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of stress distribution around implant fixture with three different crown materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies [34][35][36] have focused on the influence of the implant-abutment connection on the stress distribution in the peri-implant bone. In the present study, as observed by different authors [17,[37][38][39], the most stressed bone tissue is the cortical one. A possible reason could be the difference in the Young's modulus for the cortical and cancellous bones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Several studies [34][35][36] have focused on the influence of the implant-abutment connection on the stress distribution in the peri-implant bone. In the present study, as observed by different authors [17,[37][38][39], the most stressed bone tissue is the cortical one. A possible reason could be the difference in the Young's modulus for the cortical and cancellous bones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The statistically significant differences in microstrains values on comparing between short and standard implant length, only occurred with zirconia restorations. This was explained by Soliman TA et al (31), who reported that, crown materials with high modulus of elasticity (as Zirconia) transfer high values of the applied load to underlying bone. Conversely, BioHPP act as a shock absorber, it reduces the stress caused by natural forces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The clinical evaluation of dental implant stress distribution is important because it is possible to predict where the fracture or failure will occur [11], [23], [27], [54]. Fatigue may cause such implants to break, with serious consequences from a clinical standpoint [55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%