2012
DOI: 10.1080/13583883.2012.656696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Student Engagement: An analysis of trends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A large body of work on student engagement across a range of subject areas and instructional levels has confirmed that there is a correlation between the amount of time that students spend engaged in educational activities and students’ learning outcomes (e.g., Krause & Coates, ; Nauffal, ). Ellis () suggested that as in other disciplines the most influential factors for improving L2 acquisition were the quality and quantity of input.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large body of work on student engagement across a range of subject areas and instructional levels has confirmed that there is a correlation between the amount of time that students spend engaged in educational activities and students’ learning outcomes (e.g., Krause & Coates, ; Nauffal, ). Ellis () suggested that as in other disciplines the most influential factors for improving L2 acquisition were the quality and quantity of input.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors include such variables as spending time in the campus (Nauffal, 2011), maintaining intrinsic and extrinsic motivation (Hufton, Elliott and Illushin, 2002;Saeed and Zyngier, 2012), achieving project-based and problem-based learning (Ahlfeldt, Mehta and Sellnow, 2005;Schlechty, 2001), sports clubs, tournaments and sports and gymnasium classes (Angus Busby, 2011), curiosity, interest, studentcentered teaching, cooperative and interactive learning (Ang and Wang, 2006;Bouta et al 2012;Chickering and Gamson, 1987;Neal, 2010), faculty-student interaction (Neal, 2010), lecturer-student relationship, group works, interesting learning activities, making learning important and valuable (Steele and Fullagar, 2009;Zyngier, 2007) and the teacher's effort to teach (Saeed and Zyngier, 2012). Beer, Clark and Jones (2010) determined the factors influencing student engagement as teacher participation, course design, class size, students' gender and students' age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alanyazında bu karmaşık doğanın bağlanmayı anlamayı ve ölçümlemeyi zorlaştırdığı vurgulanmaktadır (Baron ve Corbin, 2012;Boekaerts, 2016;Leach, 2016;Ryu ve Lombardi, 2015;Zepke, Leach, ve Butler, 2014). Çeşitli araştırmalar da benzer biçimde bağlanmanın psikolojik, sosyal, hatta kültürel boyut ya da etkenlerle birlikte ele alınması gereğine işaret etmektedir (Bayar ve Uçanok, 2012;Coates ve Hillman, 2008;Frisby, Slone, ve Bengu,2016;Gunuc ve Kuzu, 2015;Nauffal, 2012;Shernoff ve ark., 2016;Tubbs ve Garner, 2008;Veiga, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified