2019
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Surrogates’ Knowledge of Patients’ Treatment Goals and Confidence in Their Ability to Make Surrogate Treatment Decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
23
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
23
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…41 The ACP intervention had a significant effect on both surrogates' longitudinal preparedness and confidence in decision-making and their understanding of the patients' treatment preferences, compared to controls. Consistent with prior research, 42 African American surrogates felt better prepared and confident in their ability to make treatment decisions, but had decreased odds of being in the high congruence class, independent of the intervention effect. Trial findings confirm ACP is beneficial 43 and support African Americans' desire to have family participate in decision-making.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…41 The ACP intervention had a significant effect on both surrogates' longitudinal preparedness and confidence in decision-making and their understanding of the patients' treatment preferences, compared to controls. Consistent with prior research, 42 African American surrogates felt better prepared and confident in their ability to make treatment decisions, but had decreased odds of being in the high congruence class, independent of the intervention effect. Trial findings confirm ACP is beneficial 43 and support African Americans' desire to have family participate in decision-making.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…30–32 However, the lasting power of attorney (surrogates for decisions about health care and treatment should the person lose the capacity to decide for themselves) 17 appointment rate in our study was low ( n = 1/10, 10%) when compared to Detering et al’s 30 research ( n = 56/154, 36%). This might be explained by (1) the small sample recruited; (2) patients believed that physicians or family members would make the best decisions for them ( contextual moderator – theme 4 ), therefore it was not necessary to officially appoint a surrogate; (3) the surrogates were not psychologically ready to play this role; 3133 (4) the patient’s preferences and views change over time; 14 and (5) a misunderstanding of the legal framework regarding advance care planning among stakeholders (e.g. patients, family members and healthcare professionals).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Palliative care providers are experts in supporting family members by facilitating critical conversations, discussing goals of care, and working to identify patient’s desires. When surrogates are more quickly identifiable, surrogate confidence in knowing the patient’s wishes can be a barrier to advance care planning discussions [ 105 ] and this should be addressed in providers communication resources for COVID-19 care. Infection-control policies for COVID-19 often present barriers to communication with surrogate decision makers, and most surrogates will not be physically present when discussing treatment options with clinicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%