2014
DOI: 10.2478/sgem-2014-0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Susceptibility to Liquefaction of Saturated Road Embankment Subjected to Dynamic Loads

Abstract: Liquefaction has always been intensely studied in parts of the world where earthquakes occur. However, the seismic activity is not the only possible cause of this phenomenon. It may in fact be triggered by some human activities, such as constructing and mining or by rail and road transport.In the paper a road embankment built across a shallow water reservoir is analyzed in terms of susceptibility to liquefaction. Two types of dynamic loadings are considered: first corresponding to an operation of a vibratory r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Kasavu landslide area, both the colluvium-mantled slopes from the 2016 slope failure and the remediated batters from the earlier February 2014 slope failure have angles of ~20-30°, well above the measured residual friction angle of 9.3°. Instability at this site is likely further compromised by the dynamic loading of the ridgeline during passage of large trucks, especially when the soil is saturated (e.g., Borowiec and Maciejewski 2014;Frangov et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Kasavu landslide area, both the colluvium-mantled slopes from the 2016 slope failure and the remediated batters from the earlier February 2014 slope failure have angles of ~20-30°, well above the measured residual friction angle of 9.3°. Instability at this site is likely further compromised by the dynamic loading of the ridgeline during passage of large trucks, especially when the soil is saturated (e.g., Borowiec and Maciejewski 2014;Frangov et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%