Assessment of sustainable development of region

Tamenova, Saltanat; Satpayeva, Z. T.; Sarkytova, A. A.; Nurgissayeva, A.

doi:10.1088/1755-1315/534/1/012008

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Based on these characteristics, a rating score is made at the regional level. The main idea of this rating was taken from Tamenova et al (2020). The integral parameters of its subsystems, economic and social, are constructed to calculate the social and economic development index.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Socio-economic inequality in Kazakhstani regions: Assessment and impact on regional development management

Sermagambet

Satpayeva²,

Smagulova

et al. 2022

Problems and Perspectives in Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Excessive differentiation of socio-economic development of regions leads to the collapse of a single socio-economic space and the emergence of socio-economic inequality. This study assessed socio-economic inequality in Kazakhstan and its impact on regional development management. It analyzed interregional disproportion of socio-economic development of regions through the index approach using statistical data from the Bureau of National Statistics for 2011–2019. A comprehensive study of the socio-economic development of Kazakhstan and its regional differences employed the proposed index of social and economic development. It was revealed that Kazakhstan has a high level of interregional differentiation of socio-economic development, which indicates the existing socio-economic inequality, requiring the development of new and improvement of existing mechanisms to create an inclusive economy. There are significant gaps in socio-economic development between Kazakhstani regions. According to the proposed index, Kazakhstan is at the above-average level (42, B). From 2011 to 2019, the index was practically at the same level (39-42). The average social and economic development was shown by Almaty (61.1, B++), Nur-Sultan (59.9, B+), Karaganda (53.1, B+), and East Kazakhstan (51.0, B+). Low social and economic development was shown by Akmola (29.8, C+) and North Kazakhstan (22.4, C+). The difference in the socio-economic development of the regions is directly interconnected with the regional economic and social policy. According to the results, to implement state policy in inclusive development and overcome socio-economic inequality, respective measures should promote economic integration, including the mechanisms of regional, industrial, and research policy, comprising all levels of state regulation. AcknowledgmentsThis study is supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan within the project “The science impact on Kazakhstan’s socio-economic development: methodology, assessment models and development scenarios” (IRN AP08052745).

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Socio-economic inequality in Kazakhstani regions: Assessment and impact on regional development management

Sermagambet

Satpayeva²,

Smagulova

et al. 2022

Problems and Perspectives in Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In general, the fundamental goal of sustainable development is to create conditions for promoting further development, transformation of territories, reasonable use of natural resources, taking into account the needs of future generations, preserving and ensuring the growth of human potential and environmental protection [5][6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Russian Volga federal district regions’ digitalisation as a factor of their sustainable development

Eflova,

Glebova,

Zakirov

et al. 2024

BIO Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article presents the author’s methodology for calculating the integral index of the level of sustainable development of Russian regions, taking into account the digital component. The object of the study is the sustainable development of the subjects of the Volga Federal District of Russia. The results of the assessment made it possible to divide the subjects under study into three groups depending on the value of the integral subindex for 2021. These groups include regions of the first group (sustainable development leaders), regions of the second group (regions with moderate sustainable development) and regions of the third group (sustainable development outsiders). Based on the results obtained, conclusions are drawn regarding the level of sustainable development of the subjects of the Volga Federal District of the Russian Federation, taking into account the digital aspect. The proposed methodology can be used for annual monitoring of the sustainability of Russian regions in four areas of development and public administration.

show abstract

Assessment of investment and innovation image of the regions of Ukraine in terms of sustainable transformations

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article examines the existing methods of assessing the innovation and investment image of the region and proposes an author's methodology that considers the development of the region's production and infrastructure to form a strategic policy to create and apply innovation and economic potential of the region. The research hypothesis is based on the use of the method of distance from the standard, allowing to obtain relatively objective and fair assessments of the innovation and investment image of the region, considering the leading indicators of enterprises, ensuring their differentiation by industry. Enterprises, industries, and regions in the top rankings are considered more attractive to investors in terms of innovation, economic and social development. To confirm the hypothesis, the method of assessing the innovation and investment image of the regions was considered, which begins with an empirical, theoretical study and ends with the practicality of use. A method for determining the rating of business activity of innovation-active and investment-attractive enterprises considering their territorial and sectoral affiliation has been developed. The study has a significant economic and regional impact: using this method of assessing the innovation and investment image of the regions allows investors to evaluate and select the region in which the investment proposal will consider the features and priorities of economic development of the region and industry trends.

show abstract

Assessment of sustainable development of region

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

Socio-economic inequality in Kazakhstani regions: Assessment and impact on regional development management

Socio-economic inequality in Kazakhstani regions: Assessment and impact on regional development management

Russian Volga federal district regions’ digitalisation as a factor of their sustainable development

Assessment of investment and innovation image of the regions of Ukraine in terms of sustainable transformations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About