This manuscri pt has been reproduced fmrn the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, sbme thesis and dissertation copies are in typemer face, while others may be from any type of cornputer printer.The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct pnnt, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, pnnt bleedthrough, substaindard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had 10 be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.Oversize materials (e-g-, maps, drawings, charts) are repmduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing fmm left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.Photographs inciuded in the original manuscript have k e n reprodu-d xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographie prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. This study also examined whether initial scores on the five main variables were related to selected abuse variables (i.e., nurnber of perpetrators, sexual abuse by a father figure, nature of sexual abuse, age of onset, duration, and frequency of sexual abuse) and whether change on the five outcome variables was related to these abuse variables. Correlational analyses arnong the five iii main variables and the abuse variables were not significant. As well, MANOVA analyses comparing change on the five main variables from the first to the last group therapy sessions by the abuse variables were not significant.