2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2019.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of tanks vulnerability and domino effect analysis in chemical storage plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Spain, the analysis of installation and operation types contribute approximately 35% and 28% for storage and process plants respectively and in developing countries, it contributes to 28% (Wu et al , 2015). In China, the type of materials involved, the contribution of production and fixed plants and the most common maintenance action sequences range from 19 to 28.4%, while repair activities reach a level of 29% of all annual CP operations (Darbra et al , 2010; Jiang et al , 2019). This is the requirement to execute effective operation of process plants in a good technique to ensure that it performs to an optimised level.…”
Section: Imperfect Maintenance Actions In Chemical Plant Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Spain, the analysis of installation and operation types contribute approximately 35% and 28% for storage and process plants respectively and in developing countries, it contributes to 28% (Wu et al , 2015). In China, the type of materials involved, the contribution of production and fixed plants and the most common maintenance action sequences range from 19 to 28.4%, while repair activities reach a level of 29% of all annual CP operations (Darbra et al , 2010; Jiang et al , 2019). This is the requirement to execute effective operation of process plants in a good technique to ensure that it performs to an optimised level.…”
Section: Imperfect Maintenance Actions In Chemical Plant Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a single parameter cannot show the damage behavior due to complex disturbances. In this sense, later studies have been carried out for multi-factor coupling effects on equipment vulnerability, and also corresponding evaluation tools have been developed [81,82]. In recent years, dynamic assessment methods were developed to explore the temporal change of an installation's vulnerability, especially for the case of domino-related studies [80].…”
Section: Vulnerability Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus is on comparing different emergency strategies to avoid the domino effects, and not on evaluating the consequences. The recent work in [15] gives a definition of vulnerability index of tanks in the context of a domino effect scenario and proposes a methodology to evaluate it, by combining different techniques. However, they do not consider maintenance effects.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%