1992
DOI: 10.1128/aem.58.12.4055-4059.1992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the Accuprobe Listeria monocytogenes culture identification reagent kit for rapid colony confirmation and its application in various enrichment broths

Abstract: The Accuprobe Listeria monocytogenes Culture Identification Reagent Kit, a nonradioactive probe, was evaluated as a colony confirmation test and in different selective or nonselective enrichment broths. The probe was 100%o sensitive and 100% specific when applied to isolated colonies. The minimal detection limit in physiological saline was established to be about 105 CFU of L. monocytogenes. Hybridization done directly in broths seeded with L. monocytogenes showed variable results. Three nonselective broths (T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) guarantees a strong, clear signal for detection of low numbers of injured L. monocytogenes cells. Combining the PSU broth system with modern molecular methods (38,39,50) should result in a hybrid system that is simple, inexpensive, and highly specific for the detection of heat-injured L. monocytogenes in foods containing background microflora. The strategy outlined in this paper might also be applied to the detection of numerous other facultatively anaerobic, food-borne pathogens, including Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Shigella spp., Yersinia spp., Vibrio spp., etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) guarantees a strong, clear signal for detection of low numbers of injured L. monocytogenes cells. Combining the PSU broth system with modern molecular methods (38,39,50) should result in a hybrid system that is simple, inexpensive, and highly specific for the detection of heat-injured L. monocytogenes in foods containing background microflora. The strategy outlined in this paper might also be applied to the detection of numerous other facultatively anaerobic, food-borne pathogens, including Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Shigella spp., Yersinia spp., Vibrio spp., etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AccuProbe, phenotypic tests and growth range. The AccuProbe (Ninet et al, 1992;Okwumabua et al, 1992) test was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Gen-Probe). Liquid broth, semi-solid media and other plating media were incubated aerobically at 1, 4, 25, 30, 37, 43 or 45 uC.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-reactivity with competitors (Enterococcus spp., Staphylococcus spp. and bther listeria) was not observed with the Accuprobe (Bobbit and Betts 1992;Ninet et al 1992;Herman and de Ridder 1993) nor with the Gene-Trak DNA (Anon. 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In further identification, traditional biochemical tests are used, including nitrate reduction and fermentation ofa range ofsugars (Lovett 1988). Newer methods for the confirmation of suspected colonies are based on latex tests and DNA probes (Ninet et al 1992). For identification on species level, systems based on biochemical tests are available .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%