2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the benefits of numerical weather predictions in wind power forecasting based on statistical methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
66
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
66
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The collected time data included the values of produced power, wind speed, temperature and pressure; the data was collected for a period of 5 years with a recorded measurement every 10 min [6], although the present wind forecasting models only consider the power produced in 1 year and the average value for the three turbines was calculated for the input vector. To verify the opportunity to use the averaged value, the correlation between the three turbines was analyzed by the estimation of the Pearson's coefficient, calculated as the ratio between the covariance of two variables and the product of their standard deviations.…”
Section: Wind Farm Characteristics and Available Time Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The collected time data included the values of produced power, wind speed, temperature and pressure; the data was collected for a period of 5 years with a recorded measurement every 10 min [6], although the present wind forecasting models only consider the power produced in 1 year and the average value for the three turbines was calculated for the input vector. To verify the opportunity to use the averaged value, the correlation between the three turbines was analyzed by the estimation of the Pearson's coefficient, calculated as the ratio between the covariance of two variables and the product of their standard deviations.…”
Section: Wind Farm Characteristics and Available Time Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, statistical techniques give good results for short time predictions, while meteorological models are more suitable for long-term forecasts, as reported in [6]. The authors of [7] compared Autoregressive-moving-average model (ARMA) models, which perform linear mapping between inputs and outputs, with Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS), which perform non-linear mapping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The literature cites numerous investigations into the use of Neural Networks for wind speed prediction (More and Deo 2003, Reikard 2008, Wu et al 2009, Hong et al 2010, Anvari Moghaddam and Seifi 2011, De Giorgi et al 2011, Shi et al 2011 Hatziargyriou 2012) but the majority of the work done to date uses historical wind speed data as the only (meteorological) parameter to train the networks. Very few exceptions exist to this with some adding other parameters such as ambient temperature and humidity when predicting wind speed (Cali et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, predictions of other meteorological variables besides the wind speed are often added in models. In some works, researchers have proven that the combination of wind direction and wind speed is effective in reducing the error of prediction [18,19], temperature and pressure can also improve the performance of statistical models [20,21], and the spatial interdependency of different variables has been proven to be effective by some studies [22]. However, in many circumstances, especially under complicated weather conditions, these parameters still cannot offer enough information for bias estimation and sometimes even worsen the forecast results, which implies that some additional or more relevant parameters are needed to provide more complete information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%