2015
DOI: 10.1364/boe.6.004288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the best flow model to characterize diffuse correlation spectroscopy data acquired directly on the brain

Abstract: Diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) is a non-invasive optical technique capable of monitoring tissue perfusion. The normalized temporal intensity autocorrelation function generated by DCS is typically characterized by assuming that the movement of erythrocytes can be modeled as a Brownian diffusion-like process instead of by the expected random flow model. Recently, a hybrid model, referred to as the hydrodynamic diffusion model, was proposed, which combines the random and Brownian flow models. The purpose … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that Eq. (3) can be expanded to use the Langevin formulation for diffusion, 13,19,20 accounting for the diffusive motion velocity vector randomization that occurs at short-time delays.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that Eq. (3) can be expanded to use the Langevin formulation for diffusion, 13,19,20 accounting for the diffusive motion velocity vector randomization that occurs at short-time delays.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, neither of the two models [Eqs. (9) and (10)] perfectly fits the data. This can be seen, e.g., in the figures appearing in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…(1), (11) and (12). It should be noted that in recent years, more accurate models for describing the dynamics in tissue has been investigated [10, 11,23]. For example, the hydrodynamic diffusion model which accounts for not only Brownian diffuse motion, but also ballistic motion at short lag times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%