1969
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1969.00021962006100010038x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the Effect of Inter‐Cane Variability on the Sampling and Harvesting of Stalks of Sugarcane1

Abstract: Random cane samples were collected from a number of commercial fields at harvest time. The canes were analysed individually to calculate the sample size required to give values within 5% of the mean at a 5% level of probability. The desired sample size to estimate quality (sugar content) varied from 12 to 618 canes; for percent fibre from 42 to 93 canes; and for average weight per cane from 204 to 397 canes. In the estimation of quality, the very large sample sizes were required only in old (19‐20‐month) crops… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biomass yield and productivity estimates can be achieved by measuring crop components; number of plants and stalk weight represent the most important crop components that can be measured, with good correlation with productivity, according to Yates (1969) et al (1999). The biomass yield and productivity estimate was calculated by separately analyzing aerial phytomass (leaves), stalk phytomass, and straw phytomass in each sampling point (Pellegrino, 2001), always using fresh or green mass data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomass yield and productivity estimates can be achieved by measuring crop components; number of plants and stalk weight represent the most important crop components that can be measured, with good correlation with productivity, according to Yates (1969) et al (1999). The biomass yield and productivity estimate was calculated by separately analyzing aerial phytomass (leaves), stalk phytomass, and straw phytomass in each sampling point (Pellegrino, 2001), always using fresh or green mass data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision of the data obtained is of interest. The sample size of 20 canes per plot was based on the work of Yates (22). This was expected to give accurate estimates of quality (in erect cane), but not of cane weight.…”
Section: Experimental Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field trials were conducted at the Miñi-Miñi Farm in Loiza, Land Authority of Puerto Rico Sugarcane Program, as representative of sugarcane growing in the humid northern coast, and the Mercedita Farm, Central Mercedita and Destino Farm, Central Aguirre, as representatives of the irrigated sugarcane of the southern coast. The experimental sites were selected to comply with two criteria: That the cane was erect, to make spraying with knapsack sprayers practicable and to minimize inter-cane variability (22); and that the cane approximated harvest age at the termination of the trial, i.e., that it was at least 8 months of age at spraying. Details of the sites and various treatments are given in table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%