2013
DOI: 10.4236/ojst.2013.39087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the effect of wound closure technique on postoperative sequaele and complications after impacted mandibular third molar extraction

Abstract: Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the effect of complete and partial wound closures on postoperative sequelae and complications after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Patients and Methods: One hundred and

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this observation is controversial issue between researchers. The reason for this discrepancy is unclear (16) and might be resulted from variations in the individual inflammatory response (12) . In addition, the ability of the surgeon (29) and the difficulty of the operation might influence the outcome of the surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this observation is controversial issue between researchers. The reason for this discrepancy is unclear (16) and might be resulted from variations in the individual inflammatory response (12) . In addition, the ability of the surgeon (29) and the difficulty of the operation might influence the outcome of the surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, researchers revealed no statistical significant difference between the two techniques (15) . Anighoro et al (16) showed a significant reduction in postoperative pain and trismus in single suture technique, however, no difference in the values of facial swelling when compared with multiple suturing technique. The summery of the above studies seen in table (1).…”
Section: Single Suture Techniquementioning
confidence: 97%
“…is is further associated with a significant deterioration in oral healthrelated quality of life in the immediate postoperative period [4] and an increase in the total expenditure for removal of third molars [5,6]. e magnitude of these sequelae depends on the extent of inflammatory response resulting from the extent of tissue damage produced [7], which in turn depends on certain demographics including age, gender, oral health status, and anatomic and operative factors such as increased surgical difficulty, magnitude of ostectomy, and duration of surgery [7]. Different closure techniques with or without incorporation of drains [8]; use of drugs such as analgesics [9], corticosteroids [10], and antibiotics [11]; and physical therapeutic methods such as cryotherapy [12], soft laser application [13], and sutureless techniques [14][15][16][17][18] are among the number of modalities reported in the literature to minimize postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sutureless closure with minimal manipulation of soft tissues and healing by secondary intention, decreasing time of surgery, leaving a self-drainage pathway for inflammatory exudate, and thereby reducing postoperative inflammation with impact on improving the oral health related quality of life index. Abundant data exists regarding the advantages of sutureless technique after third molar surgery like less pain, swelling, and trismus with comparatively few undesirable effects [5,7,[15][16][17][18] related to healing by secondary intention. In addition, there may be high potential for the formation of a periodontal pocket in relation to the adjacent second molar, but however, the literature is equivocal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of localized alveolar osteitis following mandibular third molar disimpaction is a result of a complex interaction between systemic factors, local infection and surgical trauma. [8][9][10][11][12] Notable among these factors are intraoperative complications such as alveolar bone fracture, root fracture, surgical difficulty, wound closure technique, 11,12 and, in some few cases, patient's non-adherence to post-disimpaction instructions. Findings from literature have suggested an increase in the frequency of localized alveolar osteitis following tooth extraction in female.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%